Water demand management in Syria: centralized and decentralized views

Abstract

The countries of the Middle East are characterized by large temporal and spatial variations in precipitation and with limited surface and groundwater resources. The rapid growth and development in the region have led to mounting pressures on scarce resources to satisfy water demands. The dwindling availability of water to meet development needs has become a significant regional issue, especially as a number of countries are facing serious water deficit.Syria is becoming progressively shorter of water as future demand is coming close to or even surpassing available resources. Syria had a population of 18 million in 2002, and its total renewable water resources (TRWR) is estimated around 16 £ 10 9 m 3 per year. In other words, the per capita TRWR is less than the water scarcity index (1,000 m 3 per person per year) which will make the country experience chronic stress that will hinder its economic development and entail serious degradation. Unfortunately, if water demand at current prices continues to increase in the same way, Syria will experience an alarming deficit between the available resources and the potential needs in the near future.In Syria, until fairly recently, emphasis has been placed on the supply side of water development. Demand management and improvement of patterns of water use has received less attention. The aim was always to augment the national water budget with new water. The most popular way of achieving this aim was to control surface flows by building new dams and creating multi-purpose reservoirs (there are now around 160 dams in Syria with a total capacity of 14 £ 10 9 m 3 ). Irrigation schemes were also built and agricultural activities were expanded greatly to achieve selfsufficiency in essential food products and food security. However, this is no longer achievable with the limited water resources available; water demand is rapidly increasing and easily mobilizable resources have already been exploited.The objective of this paper is to think of different possible ways to manage water demand in the agricultural sector of Syria. It mainly involves two main management options: taxation as a centralized option and water markets as a decentralized one. While water demand management refers to improving both productive and allocative efficiency of water use, this paper focuses on two allocative measures (taxation and water markets) and does not thoroughly cover productive measures such as rehabilitation and upgrading of irrigation schemes or improving operation. However, the paper does not attempt to settle the question for or against each option but tries to find some elements to determine under which conditions the option can lead to expected outcomes taking into account the history of management and the local conditions in Syria: political, social and economical. The paper also looks at other alternatives such as cooperative

Human Driving Forces of Oasis Expansion in Northwestern China During the Last Decade—A Case Study of the Heihe River Basin

“…In the past few decades, several countries have shifted their water management strategies from historical supply‐side measures, which require engineering interventions (the development of new water source and supply facilities), to demand‐side measures, which aim to improve water use efficiency (Cockerill, ; Kishore, ; Padula et al ., ; Salman & Mualla, ). However, this study showed that not all of the dominant implementation tools of water conservation taken by the demand‐side measures will lead to the expected outcome: a reduction in water demand.…”

Whose ‘reality’? Discourses and hydropolitics along the Yarmouk River

“…Most of Syrian irrigated agriculture is in need of modernization, still relying on highly inefficient flood irrigation' (Gleick 2014: 334). It is not surprising therefore that almost 90% of the water resources in Syria are used by the agricultural sector (Salman and Mualla 2008). Some even argue that the Syrian agricultural sector was based on over-exploitation and subsidies rather than on economic or environmental constraints (de Châtel 2014: 88).…”

“…It is noteworthy that direct agriculture is responsible for around 3% of the national GDP (but is magnified by sectors dependent on it, adding up to 27% of GDP), industry for around 30%, and services, including tourism, for around 67% (IFC 2012: 5). In Syria, on the other hand, in 2008 agriculture consumed about 87% of the water supply, the domestic sector about 9%, and industries about 4%(Salman and Mualla 2008). Agriculture in Syria played an important role in the…”

Quantitative Assessment of Contested Water Uses and Management in the Conflict-Torn Yarmouk River Basin

“…It is unknown what data the Syrian government collected or its quality. The data available are aggregated country-or basin-wide estimates from international donor organizations like the FAO or World Bank (Salman and Mualla 2008). For years following the 1960s, three stages can be observed in the WAJ/JVA data ( Fig.…”