Water courses and discourses: A media content analysis of environmental water reporting in Australia

Kosovac, Anna; Shermon, Alex; O’Donnell, Erin; Horne, Avril; Mesikämmen, Emma

doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103703

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Similarly, women lack representation on boards and within water organisations, limiting their access to decision making spaces that impact policy and management. This also carries to the public domain, with a recent study by Kosovac et al (2024) demonstrating that men have had the most prominent public 'voice' in irrigation and environmental water debates and were given the widest media platform from which to present their perspectives on water issue. This carries implications for environmental decision-making as women tend to have a more proenvironmental lens when making choices (McCright and Xiao, 2014;Casey and Scott, 2006).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Through a Different Lens: Unravelling Perspectives on Women's Roles in Farming and Drought Resilience

Kosovac,

Grupper

2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. A gender difference exists in the access to resources and inclusion in decision-making in issues of drought and women are overwhelmingly denied a ‘voice’ in such a landscape (Clarke 2014). This is particularly prevalent in irrigation and farming communities which carry on a legacy of patriarchal stewardship over farming and agricultural matters. This study considers the role of women in farming practice in the Mallee Region and how they view their position as decision-makers in drought and water management. This study presents three key findings from interviews of women within the region: women are increasingly adopting the label ‘farmer’ so that they can be ‘counted’ and given decision-making power regarding drought and water. Interviewees also stated a distinct difference in gender relations within horticultural dryland farming, compared to irrigation farming. Namely, many found that that gender dynamics were more progressive and equal within dryland. Some stated that this was due to many irrigation farmers being recent migrants and more likely to have traditional gender roles in their own family units, resulting in a perceived subordination of women. The dynamic between white settler farming women and those who had recently settled in the area (migrants) was wholly unexpected and highlights a potential ‘us-and-them’ distinction in farming. Despite the psychological distance of drought during the time of the interviews (many had recently experienced flooding), there was nevertheless a strong sense of the danger of drought, and the foreboding sense that it was coming. Interviewees stated that women were pivotal during times of drought as they were the ones to draw on community networks for help, to apply for grants, and also to supplement family income from off-farm work.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%