“…The spatial distribution pattern of 129 I is the opposite of that of 127 I, i.e., 129 I is higher in the Changjiang Estuary but relatively lower in the offshore seawater. The measured 129 I concentrations in the surface seawater in this study are comparable to the reported values in surface water of the North Pacific (20°N-45°N) ((0.59-3.7) × 10 7 atoms L -1 ) (Guilderson et al, 2014), Japan Sea ((0.28-5.8) × 10 7 atoms L -1 ) (Cooper et al, 2001), and southern Indian Ocean ((0.60-0.80) × 10 7 atoms L -1 ) (Povinec et al, 2011), but higher than that in Antarctic region ((0.11-0.31) × 10 7 atoms L -1 ) (Xing et al, 2017), lower than that in the Bering Sea ((1.8-131) × 10 7 atoms L -1 ) (Cooper et al, 2001) and North Atlantic (31°N-50°N) ((4.0-127) × 10 7 atoms L -1 ) , and much lower than that in the Baltic Sea ((0.25-17) × 10 10 atoms L -1 ) (Yi et al, 2011), North Sea ((0.26-38) × 10 10 atoms L -1 ) (Hou et al, 2007), Celtic Sea ((0.03-1.2) × 10 10 atoms L -1 ) (He et al, 2014) and Irish Sea ((6.2-47) × 10 10 atoms L -1 ) (Schnabel et al, 2007), where there they were heavily contaminated by the discharge from the reprocessing plants at La Hague (France) and Sellafield (UK).…”