2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water availability and formation of propagules of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi associated with sorghum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar contrasting results were reported for spores production. Drought drastically decreased their number in Gigaspora albida and Scutellospora heterogama ( Silva et al, 2015 ), Entrophospora colombiana and Acaulospora longula , ( Sieverding and Toro, 1988 ), while no effects were noticed on Gigaspora margarita, Glomus clarum , and G. mosseae ( Sylvia and Schenck, 1983 ) under greenhouse pot experiments. Spore germination was also significantly decreased in the PEG 50 treatment as compared to the other treatments and germ tube length was significantly decreased at all PEG concentrations as compared to the Control -PEG treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar contrasting results were reported for spores production. Drought drastically decreased their number in Gigaspora albida and Scutellospora heterogama ( Silva et al, 2015 ), Entrophospora colombiana and Acaulospora longula , ( Sieverding and Toro, 1988 ), while no effects were noticed on Gigaspora margarita, Glomus clarum , and G. mosseae ( Sylvia and Schenck, 1983 ) under greenhouse pot experiments. Spore germination was also significantly decreased in the PEG 50 treatment as compared to the other treatments and germ tube length was significantly decreased at all PEG concentrations as compared to the Control -PEG treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, it was not possible to separate fungus from plant and thus direct from indirect effect on the fungus. Nevertheless, the authors suggested that the effects were due to a decrease of the carbon sink constituted by the plants ( Augé, 2001 ; Manoharan et al, 2010 ; Silva et al, 2015 ). In our study conducted strictly in vitro , thus avoiding any confounding effects, only the ERM of the fungus was exposed to a decrease in water availability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%