2019
DOI: 10.1029/2019jb018229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water Availability and Deformation Processes in Smectite‐Rich Gouges During Seismic Slip

Abstract: Smectite clays occur in subduction zone fault cores at shallow depth (approximately 1 km; e.g., Japan Trench) and landslide décollements (e.g., Vajont, Italy, 1963). The availability of pore fluids affects the likelihood that seismic slip propagates from deeper to shallow fault depths or that a landslide accelerates to its final collapse. To investigate the deformation processes active during seismic faulting we performed friction experiments with a rotary machine on 2-mm-thick smectite-rich gouge layers (70/3… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
5
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…About 7 wt% of the quartz and kaolinite gouges was amorphized at frictional work of 30.33 and 0.77 MJ kg −1 , respectively (Tables 3 and 4), clearly showing that less work is required to amorphize kaolinite. This result is consistent with the results of previous studies that demonstrated preferential mechanical amorphization of clay minerals over quartz in clay‐bearing fault gouges during friction experiments (Aretusini et al, 2017, 2019). For instance, rotary‐shear friction experiments by Aretusini et al (2019) on samples composed of a mixture of smectite and opal‐CT showed that the amorphous material produced was mechanically amorphized smectite.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…About 7 wt% of the quartz and kaolinite gouges was amorphized at frictional work of 30.33 and 0.77 MJ kg −1 , respectively (Tables 3 and 4), clearly showing that less work is required to amorphize kaolinite. This result is consistent with the results of previous studies that demonstrated preferential mechanical amorphization of clay minerals over quartz in clay‐bearing fault gouges during friction experiments (Aretusini et al, 2017, 2019). For instance, rotary‐shear friction experiments by Aretusini et al (2019) on samples composed of a mixture of smectite and opal‐CT showed that the amorphous material produced was mechanically amorphized smectite.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This result is consistent with the results of previous studies that demonstrated preferential mechanical amorphization of clay minerals over quartz in clay‐bearing fault gouges during friction experiments (Aretusini et al, 2017, 2019). For instance, rotary‐shear friction experiments by Aretusini et al (2019) on samples composed of a mixture of smectite and opal‐CT showed that the amorphous material produced was mechanically amorphized smectite. Our results show that less frictional work is needed to distort the crystal structure of kaolinite than is the case for quartz, thus providing a clear explanation for the preferential amorphization of clay minerals during fault slip.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The temperature within a slip zone is locally elevated by coseismic frictional heating to quite variable maximum temperatures, even at shallow crustal levels. This is surmised from widely reported thermochemical reactions: clay mineral reactions (e.g., Brantut et al, 2008;L.-W. Kuo et al, 2011), decarbonation reactions (e.g., Han et al, 2007;Rowe, Fagereng, et al, 2012), amorphization (Aretusini et al, 2019;Rowe et al, 2019), trace element partitioning features (e.g., Ishikawa et al, 2008;Tanikawa et al, 2015), graphitization of carbonaceous material (e.g., Kuo et al, 2014;Oohashi et al, 2011), thermal maturation of Open and solid circles represent projection of the vector on the vertical and horizontal planes, respectively.…”
Section: Thermal History Of Seismic Slipmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…d ranged from 0.0012 to 0.0017 m). The gouge subdomain had a thermal conductivity of 1.5 W/(m·K), a density of 2400 kg/m 3 and a heat capacity of 1000 J/(kg·K) 51 . Two subdomains, representing the steel porous plates, were set in the intervals –d − 0.02 ≤ x ≤ − d and d ≤ x ≤ d + 0.02, with a thermal conductivity of 8.6 W/(m·K), density of 6162 kg/m 3 and heat capacity of 475 J/(kg·K) (Mottcorp datasheet).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%