2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2008.07.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water adsorption on fullerene-like carbon nitride overcoats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
36
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…using quarts crystal microbalance (QCM) measurements which showed that amorphous structures of carbon and CN x adsorbed 10 times more water compared to the nano-structured films, and rough surfaces adsorbed more than smooth films [45,46]. Those results, regarding the nano-structure, are in apparent contradiction with the present work since the a-C and a-CN x films showed larger protein adsorption compared to the nano-structured films.…”
Section: Morphology and Adsorptioncontrasting
confidence: 96%
“…using quarts crystal microbalance (QCM) measurements which showed that amorphous structures of carbon and CN x adsorbed 10 times more water compared to the nano-structured films, and rough surfaces adsorbed more than smooth films [45,46]. Those results, regarding the nano-structure, are in apparent contradiction with the present work since the a-C and a-CN x films showed larger protein adsorption compared to the nano-structured films.…”
Section: Morphology and Adsorptioncontrasting
confidence: 96%
“…Figure 2 shows the adsorption of water versus the water vapor pressure for different carbon-based films: amorphous carbon (a-C), amorphous carbon nitride (a-CN x ), and fullerene-like carbon nitride [12]. All carbon-based films show a similar dependence of water coverage on the H 2 O vapor pressure.…”
Section: Cn X Nanoscale Computer Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are, however, differences in the amounts of the adsorbed water: (i) FL-CN x shows the lower adsorption rate. Taking into consideration one monolayer coverage is roughly 30 ng/cm 2 and that at room temperature 13.3 × 10 2 Pa of H2O vapor pressure is equivalent to 50% RH [12], these films adsorb less than 2 ML at that pressure; (ii) a-CN x has adsorbed roughly 2-3 times more water than FL-CN x . (iii) Finally, a-C adsorbs more than 14 times the amount adsorbed by FL-CN x .…”
Section: Cn X Nanoscale Computer Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a model system, we have selected carbon nitride (CN x ), which is proposed as the best candidate to replace diamond-like carbon (DLC) films due to their superior wear resistance, high hardness, and low friction coefficient [1]. The first successful industrial application of this material has been the use of very thin (~2-5 nm) films for the protection of hard disks [2,3]. However, the scalability of CN x coatings produced in laboratories to industrial engineering applications has been difficult as thicker films (1-5 m) on steel substrates are required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%