1963
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1963.tb08287.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water Absorption by the Aerial Organs of Plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

1963
1963
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, our shoot immersion experiment showed that the rate of leaf water uptake was not influenced by soil water content. Vaadia and Waisel (1963) conducted a leaf immersion experiment with Helianthus annuus and Pinus halepensis and found water-stressed plants to absorb water even slower than unstressed ones. These results led the authors to suggest that a reduction in leaf conductivity to water under stressed conditions could offset the expected increase in the water flow gradient across the leaf surface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, our shoot immersion experiment showed that the rate of leaf water uptake was not influenced by soil water content. Vaadia and Waisel (1963) conducted a leaf immersion experiment with Helianthus annuus and Pinus halepensis and found water-stressed plants to absorb water even slower than unstressed ones. These results led the authors to suggest that a reduction in leaf conductivity to water under stressed conditions could offset the expected increase in the water flow gradient across the leaf surface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect was particularly marked in P. jeffrexi and P. ponderosa, and he attributed it to re-saturation of the needle tissues with a concomitant reduction in the amount of water removed from the root system. Waisel (1958) found that the saturation deficits of branches of P. halepensis exposed overnight to dew, were much lower than those of covered branches on the same plant. Later experiments with tritiated water (Vaadia and Waisel, 1963) confirmed the direct entry of water into the needles of seedlings of this species, though at a slower rate than into the leaves of a mesophyte (sunfiower), apparently because of the thicker cuticle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…bromeliads; Benzing et al 1978;Schmitt et al 1989), the flow of surface moisture into leaf tissues from the leaf surface probably has little impact on water budgets for most types of plant (Vaadia & Waisel 1963), Dew may affect plant survival by decreasing evaporative demand to zero during periods of leaf wetness, but it is unlikely to have a large effect on the overall water status of the plant (Vaadia & Waisel 1963). Instead, the physiological importance of leaf surface wetness is more related to photosynthetic gas exchange via stomatal closure (Smith & McClean 1989;Ishibashi & Terashima 1995) or physical blockage of stomatal pores (Kaul 1976;Benzing et al 1978;Brewer & Smith 1995),…”
Section: Duration Frequency and Extent Of Leaf Wetnessmentioning
confidence: 99%