Watch Me Write: Exploring the Effects of Revealing Creative Writing Process through Writing Replay

Carrera, Dashiel; Lee, Sang Won

doi:10.1145/3527927.3532806

Cited by 5 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Privacy highlights users' concerns regarding how their data is handled by a system, including a sense of surveillance over their writing process [12,191,262]. Lastly, users are concerned with the transparency [155] of writing assistants as they seek clarity on how systems operate [13,195], how data is used [195], and AI's role in these systems [13,34,191].…”

Section: Textual Diversitymentioning

confidence: 99%

A Design Space for Intelligent and Interactive Writing Assistants

Lee,

Gero,

Chung

et al. 2024

Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In our era of rapid technological advancement, the research landscape for writing assistants has become increasingly fragmented across various research communities. We seek to address this challenge by proposing a design space as a structured way to examine and explore the multidimensional space of intelligent and interactive writing assistants. Through a large community collaboration, we explore five aspects of writing assistants: task, user, technology, interaction, and ecosystem. Within each aspect, we define dimensions (i.e., fundamental components of an aspect) and codes (i.e., potential options for each dimension) by systematically reviewing 115 papers. Our design space aims to offer researchers and designers a practical tool to navigate, comprehend, and compare the various possibilities of writing assistants, and aid in the envisioning and design of new writing assistants.

show abstract

Section: Textual Diversitymentioning

confidence: 99%

A Design Space for Intelligent and Interactive Writing Assistants

Lee,

Gero,

Chung

et al. 2024

Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Reflection, although a useful part of the creative process [14,34,69,85,88], is underexplored in CST research. Some recent examples where CST researchers have discussed how qualities of their tools might support reflection [16,19,41,92] suggest an emerging discourse where a measurement of reflection in creative contexts could be useful. For example, Jonsson and Tholander [41] suggested that the "inconsistent and erroneous" [41, pg.…”

Section: Support For Creativitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…reflective creator design patterns [51]) for two minutes. We explore creative writing as it was used to test the CSI [18] and is an area where reflection is discussed [16,51]. The task also requires little prior knowledge, making it suitable for novices and likely achievable in a short amount of time.…”

Section: Story Sentiment Visualisermentioning

confidence: 99%

Towards a Reflection in Creative Experience Questionnaire

Ford

Bryan-Kinns

2023

Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Reflection is underexplored in Creativity Support Tool (CST) research, partly due to its ambiguous nature. We suggest that researchers could benefit from a measure of a CST's capacity to support reflection. To this end, we detail the first stages of development of the Reflection in Creative Experience Questionnaire (RiCE) -a lightweight questionnaire for differentiating between creative user experiences which exhibit more or less moments of reflection. We develop RiCE through i) an expert review of questionnaire items (n=10) and ii) an exploratory factor analysis (n=300) of the reviewed items. We also present a user study testing RiCE (n=58) across two time points (one week apart) with novel interfaces designed for creative writing and music making. Although we do not confirm validity, we identify four factors for RiCE which we suggest are interpretable in a conceptually meaningful way. Our formative studies contribute towards supporting future explorations on reflection with CSTs.CCS Concepts: • Applied computing → Arts and humanities; • General and reference → Measurement; • Human-centered computing → Empirical studies in HCI ; HCI design and evaluation methods; User studies.

show abstract

Why “why”? The Importance of Communicating Rationales for Edits in Collaborative Writing

Park

Lee

2023

Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Watch Me Write: Exploring the Effects of Revealing Creative Writing Process through Writing Replay

Cited by 5 publications

References 31 publications

A Design Space for Intelligent and Interactive Writing Assistants

A Design Space for Intelligent and Interactive Writing Assistants

Towards a Reflection in Creative Experience Questionnaire

Why “why”? The Importance of Communicating Rationales for Edits in Collaborative Writing

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About