2009
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2009.591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wastewater treatment modelling in practice: a collaborative discussion of the state of the art

Abstract: Three consulting teams conducted independent modelling projects for three different wastewater treatment plants ranging in size from approximately 113,800 m(3)/d (30 mgd) to 530,000 m(3)/d (140 mgd), in different parts of the world (USA and Finland). The plants have different treatment objectives ranging from nitrification and partial denitrification (nitrate plus nitrite <8.7 mg/L) to enhanced nutrient removal (total nitrogen <3 mg/L, total phosphorus <0.3 mg/L). Commonly-used models were applied in the case … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chemical doses, blower demands and other operating costs were developed using the plant-wide dynamic GPS-X model (Hydromantis, Version 5.0) shown on Figure 2. This model has been used by the Metro District's planning department and operations staff for the past 4 years, and has been calibrated and validated with plant data and special sampling efforts (Phillips et al, 2009;Phillips et al, 2010).…”
Section: Cost Opinionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemical doses, blower demands and other operating costs were developed using the plant-wide dynamic GPS-X model (Hydromantis, Version 5.0) shown on Figure 2. This model has been used by the Metro District's planning department and operations staff for the past 4 years, and has been calibrated and validated with plant data and special sampling efforts (Phillips et al, 2009;Phillips et al, 2010).…”
Section: Cost Opinionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original model calibration is described in a previous publication (Phillips et al, 2009b). Since then, the Facility has implemented a centrate management strategy to dampen the diurnal nitrogen fluctuations.…”
Section: Model Calibration and Validationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this respect, Choubert et al (2013) stated that based on combined expertise of modellers (Phillips et al 2009) and sensitivity analysis (Petersen et al 2002) profound effects of wastewater characterisation on modelling outputs have been shown:  Sludge production is influenced by the estimated inert particulate COD.  Oxygen demand is influenced by the estimated total biodegradable COD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%