1997
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-22605-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wastewater Treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
66
3
17

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
66
3
17
Order By: Relevance
“…Carbon content of the substrates under study fell within the range of 36.3-55.7% TS, and organic nitrogen content 1.45-1.87% TS. For an anaerobic reactor to function properly, the dry matter content of the feedstock should be within the range from 5 to 15 g TS l -1 (Henze et al, 1997). In the course of the study the average concentration of the bioreactor feedstock was 6% TS.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carbon content of the substrates under study fell within the range of 36.3-55.7% TS, and organic nitrogen content 1.45-1.87% TS. For an anaerobic reactor to function properly, the dry matter content of the feedstock should be within the range from 5 to 15 g TS l -1 (Henze et al, 1997). In the course of the study the average concentration of the bioreactor feedstock was 6% TS.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to textbook knowledge (5,19), Nitrospira-like bacteria, not Nitrobacter spp., are the dominant nitrite oxidizers both in most full-scale wastewater treatment plants and in laboratory scale reactors (22,36,43,48). Based on fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) combined with microelectrode measurements, it has been suggested that Nitrospira-like nitrite oxidizers represent K strategists adapted to low nitrite and oxygen concentrations, while Nitrobacter sp., as an r strategist, thrives if nitrite and oxygen are present in higher concentrations (42).…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…When treating wastewater, it is usually stated that the ratio of COD:N:P in the wastewater to be treated should be approximately 100:5:1 for aerobic treatment and 250:5:1 for anaerobic treatment (Metcalf and Eddy, 1991 USEPA, 1995;Henze et al, 1997;Maier, 1999 a). For anaerobic treatment, the required nitrogen and phosphorous concentrations is lower than the case for aerobic treatment due to the fact that anaerobic treatment produces only 20% sludge compared to aerobic treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%