Irrigation and Drainage - Sustainable Strategies and Systems 2015
DOI: 10.5772/59361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wastewater Reuse for Irrigation — Practices, Safe Reuse and Perspectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Soil is a primary exposed environmental compartment within RWAI and, whilst exposure after sludge application is considered within regulatory chemical risk assessment, the use of RWAI is not. Data recorded over many years of RWAI practice in the Tula Valley (Mexico) show a mean retention of 86% of chemical contaminants in soil (Navarro et al, 2015) and Carter et al (2019) Finally, the EC methodology to derive EQS supports the conversion of QSs developed for biota in the aquatic food web into equivalent aquatic concentrations in order to allow monitoring in water only. For the conversion of a terrestrial biota standard into a soil concentration, a similar calculation can be made using the relevant biota-to-soil-accumulation-factor (BSAF, usually for earthworms) and biomagnification factors from preys to predators (usually from earthworm to small terrestrial birds or mammals) as suggested by Verbruggen (2014).…”
Section: Prioritisation and Qs Derivation Methodology: Data On Terresmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Soil is a primary exposed environmental compartment within RWAI and, whilst exposure after sludge application is considered within regulatory chemical risk assessment, the use of RWAI is not. Data recorded over many years of RWAI practice in the Tula Valley (Mexico) show a mean retention of 86% of chemical contaminants in soil (Navarro et al, 2015) and Carter et al (2019) Finally, the EC methodology to derive EQS supports the conversion of QSs developed for biota in the aquatic food web into equivalent aquatic concentrations in order to allow monitoring in water only. For the conversion of a terrestrial biota standard into a soil concentration, a similar calculation can be made using the relevant biota-to-soil-accumulation-factor (BSAF, usually for earthworms) and biomagnification factors from preys to predators (usually from earthworm to small terrestrial birds or mammals) as suggested by Verbruggen (2014).…”
Section: Prioritisation and Qs Derivation Methodology: Data On Terresmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…An important dimension of this discussion is the agreement of what represents an acceptable risk; in many areas globally (notably including Spain, Italy and Greece), TWW is widely reused in agriculture [3]; therefore, it may be deemed that current levels of reuse within the Netherlands are acceptable within this context. Moreover, risk is dependent on irrigation practices and crop types, with drip and sub-surface irrigation systems reducing the chances of the contamination of produce [39]. The adoption of these irrigation practices and further treatment at WWTPs could represent mitigation strategies if the level of risk is deemed unacceptable.…”
Section: Practical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Source: Refs. [6,[45][46][47]. In general, the standard values have been set to protect human health, allowing sludge application at sites where human contact may occur [48].…”
Section: Human Helminthiasis 44mentioning
confidence: 99%