2018
DOI: 10.5276/jswtm.2018.387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Waste-to-Energy Technologies: a Literature Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The advantage of incineration over the other WtE technology is that it uses almost all types of MWS fraction and can reduce the volume of the waste by 80% and the solid mass by 70%. However, the initial costs to invest in such a plant is very high and could eventually lead to air and/or water pollution [14,15].…”
Section: Thermochemical Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The advantage of incineration over the other WtE technology is that it uses almost all types of MWS fraction and can reduce the volume of the waste by 80% and the solid mass by 70%. However, the initial costs to invest in such a plant is very high and could eventually lead to air and/or water pollution [14,15].…”
Section: Thermochemical Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the pyrolysis process, up to 80% of the carbonaceous fraction of the feedstock (here, MSW) used is recovered [14]. There are three types of pyrolysis reactions (slow, fast, and flash pyrolysis) depending on the operating parameters, such as temperature, heating rate, particle size, and residence time [15]. The proportion of each of the three fuels produced from the process depends on the type of pyrolysis used, as seen in the Table 1 [15,17,18].…”
Section: Thermochemical Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations