2017
DOI: 10.1080/15567249.2016.1176088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Waste-to-energy policy in Thailand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, in urban areas like Noenpayom, Watchaklukya, Ban Thapma, and Rayong City, a recycling network is automatically connected as they are a part of the centralised treatment facility network through energy recovery and final disposal for handling enormous wastes daily. This practical management procedure is also found in other provinces, such as Phuket [ 30 ], Nonthaburi [ 31 ], or a central city of South Korea [ 4 ], where the centralised facility has operated as a part of waste management. Promoting recycling activity and the sorting facility could promote more circularity of PPW material.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Moreover, in urban areas like Noenpayom, Watchaklukya, Ban Thapma, and Rayong City, a recycling network is automatically connected as they are a part of the centralised treatment facility network through energy recovery and final disposal for handling enormous wastes daily. This practical management procedure is also found in other provinces, such as Phuket [ 30 ], Nonthaburi [ 31 ], or a central city of South Korea [ 4 ], where the centralised facility has operated as a part of waste management. Promoting recycling activity and the sorting facility could promote more circularity of PPW material.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The proposed approach has been applied to the design of a MSW treatment facility This calls for better waste management for the improvement of the current practice. In terms of waste characteristics, the MSW is categorized as organic waste (61%), plastic (17%), glass (6%), papers (8%), metal (2%), wood (1%), rubber/leather (1%), cloth (1%), and other waste (3%) [35]. For the sake of simplicity, the four largest compositions of MSW are considered in this study.…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This calls for better waste management for the improvement of the current practice. In terms of waste characteristics, the MSW is categorized as organic waste (61%), plastic (17%), glass (6%), papers (8%), metal (2%), wood (1%), rubber/leather (1%), cloth (1%), and other waste (3%) [36]. For the sake of simplicity, the four largest compositions of MSW are considered in this study.…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%