2020
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02925
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Waste Reduction Strategies: Factors Affecting Talent Wastage and the Efficacy of Talent Selection in Sport

Abstract: Coaches are faced with the difficult task of identifying and selecting athletes to their team. Despite its widespread practice in sport, there is still much to learn about improving the identification and selection process. Evidence to date suggests selection decisions (at different competitive levels) can be inaccurate, bias driven, and sometimes even illogical. These mistakes are believed to contribute to "talent wastage," the effect of a coach's wrongful selection and/or deselection of an athlete to/from a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 120 publications
0
39
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Biological-psychological-social development influences talent identification decisions and the efficacy of such decisions (Johnston and Baker, 2019). Therefore, without an understanding of pediatric science and the processes of biological-psychologicalsocial development in children and adolescents, coaches and practitioners are unable to make informed decisions in relation to athlete performance and potential (Gonçalves et al, 2012).…”
Section: Possible Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biological-psychological-social development influences talent identification decisions and the efficacy of such decisions (Johnston and Baker, 2019). Therefore, without an understanding of pediatric science and the processes of biological-psychologicalsocial development in children and adolescents, coaches and practitioners are unable to make informed decisions in relation to athlete performance and potential (Gonçalves et al, 2012).…”
Section: Possible Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of such biases include confirmation bias, 35 primacy effect, 36,37 recency bias, 38,39 among many more. All of which have been linked to poor talent evaluation by coaches and experts in various sports settings 40‐43 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strong rules satisfy both the minimum support threshold (Minsup) and minimum confidence threshold (Minconf) rules ( Watkins et al, 2020 ). Moreover, support is an important measure ( Johnston and Baker, 2020 ). Since the rule with low support may emerge by chance, it rarely occurs in the entire dataset.…”
Section: Data Mining and Apriori Algorithm For Association Rule Analymentioning
confidence: 99%