Waste pickers in the informal economy of the Global South: included or excluded?

Abstract

Purpose: This article aims to provide insights into the role and practices of informal waste pickers and the implications for waste management policy in urban contexts of the Global South.Design/methodology/approach: A qualitative case study was used, including interviews, observations and document analyses. We compared informal waste management in two cities of the Global South: Accra (Ghana) and Porto Alegre (Brazil). Findings:The analysis points out that informal waste pickers play a crucial role in the implementation of waste policies in both cities, despite differing economic, social and institutional contexts. The study of the waste management system also points to multiple connections between informal and formal parts of the economy. Although the informal waste pickers are integral to the waste management system, their economically disadvantaged position excludes them from the formal labour market.Faced with these challenges, they develop creative solutions to guarantee their livelihood and gain collective voice. Research limitations:The comparison of two case studies, conducted about the same social phenomenon in two different economic, institutional and social contexts, has limited generalizability but is theoretically and practically important. Practical implications:The findings are relevant to policy-makers who deal with urban waste management and for organizations who develop support actions for informal workers. Originality/value:We draw on a comparison of qualitative case studies to explore the multidimensionality of the waste picker's phenomenon. This article sparks discussion among scholars 1 Both authors contributed equally to this article. 2and experts who study the informal economy from different perspectives, in this case bridging insights from sociology and victimology.

Evaluating working conditions in the informal economy: Evidence from the 2015 European Working Conditions Survey

“…The widespread perception, therefore, is that informal employees have poorer working conditions than formal employees. Firstly, informal employees are depicted as working in poorer physical environments such as noisy or high temperature workplaces (Coletto and Bisschop, 2017;Gallin, 2001;Harriss-White, 2017;Yimyam and Jirapattarapimol, 2007).…”

Explaining Variations in the Commonality of Informal Sector Competition Across Latin American and the Caribbean Countries

“…Over the past decade, a new sub-field of entrepreneurship scholarship has emerged that focuses upon understanding and explaining the relationship between entrepreneurship and the informal sector (Aidis et al, 2006;Bureau and Fendt, 2011;Coletto and Bisschop, 2017;Kus, 2014;Mróz, 2012;Ram et al, 2017;Webb et al, 2009Webb et al, , 2013Williams, 2018). This new sub-field has variously studied who participates in informal sector entrepreneurship (Thai and Turkina, 2014;Williams and Martinez-Perez, 2014) and whether they are necessity-and/or opportunity-driven (Adom and Williams, 2014;Maloney, 2004;Perry and Maloney, 2007), its variable prevalence (Autio and Fu, 2015;Kedir, 2016, 2017a) and how this can be explained (Dau and Cuervo-Cazurra, 2014;Siqueira et al, 2016).…”

Explaining Cross-National Variations in the Prevalence of Informal Sector Entrepreneurship: Lessons From a Survey of 142 Countries

“…Recent years have seen the emergence of a burgeoning literature on informal entrepreneurship (Aidis et al, 2006;Bureau and Fendt, 2011;Coletto and Bisschop, 2017;Kus, 2014;Mróz, 2012;Ram et al, 2017;Webb et al, 2009Webb et al, , 2013Williams, 2018). This literature has sought to understand not only the prevalence of informal entrepreneurship (Autio and Fu, 2015;Williams andKedir, 2016, 2017) and the determinants of its variable prevalence (Dau and Cuervo-Cazurra, 2014;Siqueira et al, 2016), but also who participates (Thai and Turkina, 2014;Williams and Martinez-Perez, 2014) and their motives, including whether they are necessity-and/or opportunity-driven (Adom and Williams, 2012;Maloney, 2004;Perry and Maloney, 2007).…”