2011
DOI: 10.13182/fst11-a12445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Waste Management Assessment of Candidate Materials for HiPER Reaction Chamber

Abstract: One of the critical decisions in the HiPER

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the results of the previous design [1,2], together with the obtained results, we can conclude that outside the Bioshield, workers may stand during the operation of the facility. In effect, it was already a free-exclusion area in the previous design, and in the current design, there are bigger shields.…”
Section: Dose To Workersmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Considering the results of the previous design [1,2], together with the obtained results, we can conclude that outside the Bioshield, workers may stand during the operation of the facility. In effect, it was already a free-exclusion area in the previous design, and in the current design, there are bigger shields.…”
Section: Dose To Workersmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…As it will be necessary for the chamber to exert some structural functions, aluminum alloys are definitively abandoned as candidate materials for the reaction chamber in benefit of steel alloys. Commercial T91 steel has been selected from a previous study [2] for waste management considerations.…”
Section: Baseline Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations