2022
DOI: 10.3390/en15062010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Waste Clothing Recycling Channel Selection Using a CoCoSo-D Method Based on Sine Trigonometric Interaction Operational Laws with Pythagorean Fuzzy Information

Abstract: Under the influence of circular economy theory, waste clothing recycling has been widely studied in the resource sector, and the waste clothing recycling channel (WCRC) is the vital link that affects the recycling efficiency of waste clothing. How to select the optimal WCRC is considered a typical multiple attribute group decision-making (MAGDM) problem. In this article, we develop sine trigonometric interaction operational laws (IOLs) (STIOLs) using Pythagorean fuzzy information. The sine trigonometric intera… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CoCoSo method has been used for renewable energy investments evaluation (Mi and Liao, 2020), assessing and prioritizing failures in a production process (Yousefi et al, 2021), evaluating the green growth indicators for sustainable development (Alrasheedi et al, 2021), healthcare sector performances evaluation (Torkayesh et al, 2021b), assessing significant circular practices in the context of emerging economies (Khan and Haleem, 2021), identifying the most apposite spray painting robot for an automobile industry (Kumar et al, 2022), social sustainability performance (Torkayesh et al, 2021a), selection of insulation materials (Ulutas ¸et al, 2021), cloud service provider selection (Mandal and Khan, 2022), financial risk evaluation (Peng and Huang, 2020). prioritizing of industrial wastewater management processes (Adar et al, 2022), waste clothing recycling channel selection (Wang et al, 2022) and assessment of sustainable development goals (Stanujkic et al, 2020). MAIRCA method has been performed in some studies like prioritizing the railway infrastructure projects (Pamucar et al, 2022), flood susceptibility evaluation (Hadian et al, 2022), material selection (Chatterjee and Chakraborty, 2022), supplier selection (Badi and Ballem, 2018), evaluation of macroeconomic performance (Belke, 2020), location selection for waste disposal (Pirbasti et al, 2020), vaccine selection (Ecer, 2022), overtourism assessment (Garc ıa Mestanza and Bakhat, 2021), selection of sites for ammunition depots (Gigovi c et al, 2016), menu evaluation for restaurant management (Arsi c et al, 2019) and determination of constructive elements of weapons (Bo zani c et al, 2020).…”
Section: Applications Of Mcdm Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CoCoSo method has been used for renewable energy investments evaluation (Mi and Liao, 2020), assessing and prioritizing failures in a production process (Yousefi et al, 2021), evaluating the green growth indicators for sustainable development (Alrasheedi et al, 2021), healthcare sector performances evaluation (Torkayesh et al, 2021b), assessing significant circular practices in the context of emerging economies (Khan and Haleem, 2021), identifying the most apposite spray painting robot for an automobile industry (Kumar et al, 2022), social sustainability performance (Torkayesh et al, 2021a), selection of insulation materials (Ulutas ¸et al, 2021), cloud service provider selection (Mandal and Khan, 2022), financial risk evaluation (Peng and Huang, 2020). prioritizing of industrial wastewater management processes (Adar et al, 2022), waste clothing recycling channel selection (Wang et al, 2022) and assessment of sustainable development goals (Stanujkic et al, 2020). MAIRCA method has been performed in some studies like prioritizing the railway infrastructure projects (Pamucar et al, 2022), flood susceptibility evaluation (Hadian et al, 2022), material selection (Chatterjee and Chakraborty, 2022), supplier selection (Badi and Ballem, 2018), evaluation of macroeconomic performance (Belke, 2020), location selection for waste disposal (Pirbasti et al, 2020), vaccine selection (Ecer, 2022), overtourism assessment (Garc ıa Mestanza and Bakhat, 2021), selection of sites for ammunition depots (Gigovi c et al, 2016), menu evaluation for restaurant management (Arsi c et al, 2019) and determination of constructive elements of weapons (Bo zani c et al, 2020).…”
Section: Applications Of Mcdm Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of creating FFSs apart from q-ROFSs is that the q = 3 operation gives enough breadth to solve most decision problems. There are some recent studies in which IFSs [95,110], PFSs [111,112] and q-ROFSs [113,114] were used. On the other hand, FFS enables for more general uncertainty modeling than IFS and PFS because the sum of the IFS membership and non-membership degrees must equal one.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wen et al [36] explored the CoCoSo method in hesitant fuzzy linguistic environment. Wang et al [37] discussed the CoCoSo method and theri application to real life problems.…”
Section: A Brief Review On the Development Of Cocoso Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%