2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.04.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Waste-cellulose-derived porous carbon adsorbents for methyl orange removal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
51
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 200 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
3
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculated parameters of the two models are tabulated in Table 9. Comparing the coefficient of determination values (R 2 ) of the two models, the experimental data were in good agreement with the PSO model (R 2 = 0.995) [19,44,45]. Therefore, the reaction can be represented as:…”
Section: Kinetics Studiessupporting
confidence: 52%
“…The calculated parameters of the two models are tabulated in Table 9. Comparing the coefficient of determination values (R 2 ) of the two models, the experimental data were in good agreement with the PSO model (R 2 = 0.995) [19,44,45]. Therefore, the reaction can be represented as:…”
Section: Kinetics Studiessupporting
confidence: 52%
“…The calculated parameters of the two models are listed in Table 7. By comparing the coefficient of determination values (R 2 ) of the two models, it could be concluded that the experimental data were in good agreement with the PSO model (R 2 = 0.993) [49,50]. Therefore, the reaction is represented as follows: According to the Elovich model shown in Figure 10C, the high R 2 values (0.987) show that the desorption rate was higher than the initial sorption.…”
Section: Kinetic Studiesmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Other parameters together with their values are listed in Table 8 . By comparing the linearity and the calculated adsorption capacity at equilibrium for these two models, it can be detected that the PSO model is more applicable in explaining the adsorption of RB onto RPAL [ 49 , 50 , 51 ]. Therefore, the reaction of RB with RPAL can be expressed as: …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%