2010
DOI: 10.3327/jnst.47.1023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wastage and Self-Plugging by a Potential CO2 Ingress in a Supercritical CO2 Power Conversion System of an SFR

Abstract: For a CO 2 ingress accident into liquid sodium in a supercritical CO 2 power conversion system coupled with a sodium-cooled fast reactor, we investigated two major design issues: i) a wastage phenomenon in regard to structural damage adjacent to the leaking position, and ii) potential channel plugging due to the formation of a particulate reaction product. In order to understand the factors affecting the occurrence of these issues, two kinds of experiments were carried out: a wastage effect test and a self-plu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The advantages of the S-CO 2 Brayton cycle include an increase in thermal efficiency, a reduction of CO 2 emission, and a compact size of components compared with the conventional steam Rankine cycle and Brayton cycles at an operating temperature above 500 • C [1,2]. In addition, an indirect S-CO 2 cycle coupled to the sodium-cooled fast reactor (SFR) could eliminate the possibility of an explosive reaction between hightemperature steam and liquid sodium [4,5], thus enhancing the safety of the nuclear systems. On the other hand, for the selection of candidate structural materials in a high-temperature S-CO 2 environment, it is essential to assess the material compatibility because excessive corrosion, oxide spallation, and internal carburization might deteriorate the heat transfer capability and long-term integrity of components, such as the compact-type intermediate heat exchanger (IHX).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The advantages of the S-CO 2 Brayton cycle include an increase in thermal efficiency, a reduction of CO 2 emission, and a compact size of components compared with the conventional steam Rankine cycle and Brayton cycles at an operating temperature above 500 • C [1,2]. In addition, an indirect S-CO 2 cycle coupled to the sodium-cooled fast reactor (SFR) could eliminate the possibility of an explosive reaction between hightemperature steam and liquid sodium [4,5], thus enhancing the safety of the nuclear systems. On the other hand, for the selection of candidate structural materials in a high-temperature S-CO 2 environment, it is essential to assess the material compatibility because excessive corrosion, oxide spallation, and internal carburization might deteriorate the heat transfer capability and long-term integrity of components, such as the compact-type intermediate heat exchanger (IHX).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The supercritical-carbon dioxide (S-CO 2 ) Brayton cycle is an attractive option for energy conversion systems of next-generation nuclear reactors, advanced-fossil power plants, and other power generating applications [1][2][3][4][5]. The advantages of the S-CO 2 Brayton cycle include an increase in thermal efficiency, a reduction of CO 2 emission, and a compact size of components compared with the conventional steam Rankine cycle and Brayton cycles at an operating temperature above 500 • C [1,2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approximately 325 standard liters of CO 2 were injected into a 45 cm (15 inch) high column of sodium at a nominal temperature of 150 ˚C over the course of 3 hours. The inlet CO 2 No plugging of the micro-nozzle was detected during this experiment. Data from these experiments was reported and initial analyses of the data were completed and discussed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…It should also be noted that the production of carbon monoxide at the test temperature completed here (170 ˚C) is not necessarily expected. Other researchers (Eoh et al, 2010) have not seen substantial reaction products until a temperature of 300 ˚C. This is an additional reason for skepticism that CO was generated during this first test.…”
Section: Report On the Initial Fundamental Sodium-co2 Interaction Expmentioning
confidence: 83%