The Political Economy of Wasta: Use and Abuse of Social Capital Networking 2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-22201-1_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wasta: A Scourge or a Useful Management and Business Practice?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a noun, it denotes a person who mediates or intercedes to achieve gain (Ali, 2016; Ali & Weir, 2019; Cunningham & Sarayrah, 1993). The process of wasta consists of three parties: the person in need (e.g., someone seeking a job), the provider (i.e., a person in a position of power, such as an HR manager), and an intermediary between them (i.e., a person with the ability to influence the provider) (Aldossari & Robertson, 2015; Ali & Weir, 2020; Alsarhan & Valax, 2020; Tucker & Bucton‐Tucker, 2014; Weir et al, 2016). However, the third party is needed only when the first two parties are not strongly acquainted or related and the third party is strongly related to both of them.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a noun, it denotes a person who mediates or intercedes to achieve gain (Ali, 2016; Ali & Weir, 2019; Cunningham & Sarayrah, 1993). The process of wasta consists of three parties: the person in need (e.g., someone seeking a job), the provider (i.e., a person in a position of power, such as an HR manager), and an intermediary between them (i.e., a person with the ability to influence the provider) (Aldossari & Robertson, 2015; Ali & Weir, 2020; Alsarhan & Valax, 2020; Tucker & Bucton‐Tucker, 2014; Weir et al, 2016). However, the third party is needed only when the first two parties are not strongly acquainted or related and the third party is strongly related to both of them.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding how wasta pervades business activities also is relevant, for both managers and researchers (Iles, Almhedie, & Baruch, 2012), considering the growing economic significance of the Arab world, which offers investors and exporters lucrative opportunities across many business sectors and markets (Hutchings & Weir, 2006b; Weir, Sultan, & Van De Bunt, 2016). To ensure the effectiveness of their subsidiary operations in the region, international managers need to understand its mechanisms (Ali & Weir, 2020; Weir et al, 2016). In a recent systematic review of peer‐reviewed journals, Ali and Weir (2020) demonstrate that despite studies of wasta in various contexts and according to different aspects and theoretical lenses, a research gap remains with regard to factors that affect its use, especially by human resources management (HRM) practitioners.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional notions of wasta (personal conflicts being solved by a powerful person such as a tribal leader) are changing, whereby now wasta can be aligned with the ability to secure benefits because of connection, rather than merit (Mohamed and Mohamad, 2011; Tlaiss and Kauser, 2011; Weir et al , 2016). Accordingly, most existing definitions describe wasta as providing access through connection to a more powerful individual (for a specific task) by an inferior, and always serving a specific purpose (Al-Fasial and Abdulellah, 1993; Smith et al , 2011).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars (Cunningham et al , 1994; Hutchings and Weir, 2006b; Weir et al , 2016) suggest that using wasta can have a positive impact (as an intermediary) for solving conflict, or negative (intercessory) impact through increasing an individual’s interest regardless of others. For example, wasta can cause conflict within teams when unqualified team members are assigned to the team only because of their wasta (Kilani et al , 2015).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation