2012
DOI: 10.1162/artl_a_00065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wasps, Termites, and Waspmites: Distinguishing Competence from Performance in Collective Construction

Abstract: We introduce a distinction between algorithm performance and algorithm competence and argue that bio-inpsired computing should characterise the former rather than the latter. To exemplify this, we explore and extend a bio-inspired algorithm for collective construction influenced by paper wasp behaviour. Despite being provably general in its competence we demonstrate limitations on the algorithm's performance. We explain these limitations, and extend the algorithm to include pheromone-mediated behaviour typical… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(70 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, making bird flocks virtually heterogeneous by diversifying their cohesion and alignment parameters, as if mixing different species ("swarm chemistry" [8]), can result in surprisingly complex and robust morphologies. Similarly, giving virtual wasps a pheromone that they can lay down and follow like termites ("waspmites" [9]) enhances their computation abilities, and transforms their usually repetitive nests into more elaborate constructions. In modern biotechnological endeavors such as synthetic biology [10,11], real-world genomic information can also be tampered with in specific ways to steer the emergent collective behavior of cellular populations toward new outcomes, whether for biomedical applications (such as organ growth) or "natural computing" [12] (such as organic processors).…”
Section: Toward Programmable Self-organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, making bird flocks virtually heterogeneous by diversifying their cohesion and alignment parameters, as if mixing different species ("swarm chemistry" [8]), can result in surprisingly complex and robust morphologies. Similarly, giving virtual wasps a pheromone that they can lay down and follow like termites ("waspmites" [9]) enhances their computation abilities, and transforms their usually repetitive nests into more elaborate constructions. In modern biotechnological endeavors such as synthetic biology [10,11], real-world genomic information can also be tampered with in specific ways to steer the emergent collective behavior of cellular populations toward new outcomes, whether for biomedical applications (such as organ growth) or "natural computing" [12] (such as organic processors).…”
Section: Toward Programmable Self-organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, making bird flocks virtually heterogeneous by diversifying their cohesion and alignment parameters, as if mixing different species ("swarm chemistry" [41]), can result in surprisingly complex and robust morphologies. Similarly, giving virtual wasps a pheromone that they can lay down and follow like termites ("waspmites" [10]) enhances their computation abilities, and transforms their usually repetitive nests into more elaborate constructions. In modern biotechnological endeavors such as synthetic biology [19,28], real-world genomic information can also be tampered with in specific ways to steer the emergent collective behavior of cellular populations toward new outcomes, whether for biomedical applications (such as organ growth) or "natural computing" [44] (such as organic processors).…”
Section: Toward Programmable Self-organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, papers wasps and African termites and their construction methods have been modeled (Karsai, 1999;Bonabeau, 1998;Theraulaz and Bonabeau, 1995a;Downing and Jeanne, 1988). This construction process has inspired the development of a number of computational techniques (Petersen et al, 2011;Feltell et al, 2005;Bullock et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%