2020
DOI: 10.3390/rel11020073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Was the Temple on Mount Gerizim Modelled after the Jerusalem Temple?

Abstract: Was the Yahweh temple on Mount Gerizim modelled after the temple in Jerusalem? This question is important for our understanding of the sanctuary on Mount Gerizim and the people who worshipped there in the Persian and Hellenistic period; if the Gerizim temple was modelled after the Jerusalem temple, the argument in favour of the Gerizim cult as derived from the cult in Jerusalem is strengthened. On the other hand, if no such connection can be demonstrated convincingly, one must look elsewhere for the answer to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of some of the identified "major sections" questions arise about the criteria used by the author to delimit them. Those who are familiar with the structure of Deuteronomy may ask, for example, about the reasons for Adamczewski to decompose the Deuteronomic Code (Deut 12-26) and divide it into three "major sections" in his monograph (14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34), while ignoring, for instance, the delimiting introductions to the speeches in 12:1 and 27:1. The consequence of such a breakdown of the Deuteronomic Code is the creation of a completely new rhetorical unit, Deut 11:29-12:28, the hypertextual transposition of which is the narrative about the sacrifice on Mount Moriah (Gen 22:1-10).…”
Section: Question About the Delimitation Of Literary Units In Hyperte...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the case of some of the identified "major sections" questions arise about the criteria used by the author to delimit them. Those who are familiar with the structure of Deuteronomy may ask, for example, about the reasons for Adamczewski to decompose the Deuteronomic Code (Deut 12-26) and divide it into three "major sections" in his monograph (14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34), while ignoring, for instance, the delimiting introductions to the speeches in 12:1 and 27:1. The consequence of such a breakdown of the Deuteronomic Code is the creation of a completely new rhetorical unit, Deut 11:29-12:28, the hypertextual transposition of which is the narrative about the sacrifice on Mount Moriah (Gen 22:1-10).…”
Section: Question About the Delimitation Of Literary Units In Hyperte...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gudme points out the flaws in Magen's argument for interpreting the ruins dating to the 5th century BC as an implementation of Ezekiel's temple design (Ezek 40-42). 24 Although Benedikt Hensel supports the existence of a temple on Mount Gerazim in the 5th century, he admits that it is currently impossible to determine the time of its construction based on the excavation documentation presented by Magen. 25 It remains regrettable that Adamczewski ignores those critical (or at least cautious -in the case of Hensel) voices, especially since he refers to Mor's and Hensel's articles in his monograph.…”
Section: Question About the Delimitation Of Literary Units In Hyperte...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details have also emerged concerning the sanctuary itself, although the matter of the sanctuary’s similarity (or not) to the Jerusalem Temple remains contested. Magen’s excavations, as well as the publication of pottery finds from an earlier project overseen by G. Ernest Wright (Lapp 2008; see also Berlin 2010), have led to a scholarly consensus on two phases of activity: an earlier Persian-period walled precinct and a Hellenistic expansion (see Gudme 2020; Knoppers 2019c; Zangenberg 2012). Recent excavations also emphasize the need for caution in applying some traditional identifiers to Samaritan (over against Jewish) synagogues in the later period, such as their orientation to Gerizim, aniconic decoration, and lack of lulav and etrog (Pummer 2018; Talgam 2014).…”
Section: Scholarly Moves In the Study Of The Samaritans Since 2004mentioning
confidence: 99%