PsycTESTS Dataset 2007
DOI: 10.1037/t01628-000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale

Abstract: Background

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
60
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(18 reference statements)
1
60
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although maternal psychological health in the present study was within a normal range for a community sample (see, Condon & Corkindale, 1998;Crawford, Henry, Crombie & Taylor, 2001;Davies et al, 2008;Jones et al, 2013;Tennant et al, 2007), maternal mood was negatively correlated with perceived mother-infant attachment (see also Davies et al, 2008). This correlation suggests that perceived mother-infant attachment might be a more appropriate measure of the mother-infant relationship than maternal perceptions of their infant's warmth and invasiveness used by Jones et al, (2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although maternal psychological health in the present study was within a normal range for a community sample (see, Condon & Corkindale, 1998;Crawford, Henry, Crombie & Taylor, 2001;Davies et al, 2008;Jones et al, 2013;Tennant et al, 2007), maternal mood was negatively correlated with perceived mother-infant attachment (see also Davies et al, 2008). This correlation suggests that perceived mother-infant attachment might be a more appropriate measure of the mother-infant relationship than maternal perceptions of their infant's warmth and invasiveness used by Jones et al, (2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…Internal reliability from Cronbach's alpha was .86 for the present sample. Well-being Scale (WEMWBS;Tennant, Hiller, Fishwick, Platt, Joseph, Weich et al, 2007): This 14 item questionnaire was chosen to measure mother's mental well-being. The questionnaire consists of positively worded statements such as, "I've been feeling good about myself" and "I've had energy to spare" scored on a 5 point scale from none of the time to all of the time.…”
Section: Face/voice Stimulimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 Study flow and treatment differences over time. Jackson, 1990) Cardiorespatory fitness using estimated VO 2 max ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ Behavioral Regulation In Exercise Questionnaire (BREQ 2; Markland & Tobin, 2004) Behavioural regulation in exercise ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS; Tennant et al, 2007) Mental well-being ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ Regret Scale (Schwartz et al, 2002) Regret tendency ▲ Regret Experience Measure (REM; Creyer & Ross, 1999) Anticipated regret ▲ ▲ Nationality ▲ Education ▲ Income ▲ a Gym attendance is measured throughout the trial b Weight is also measured weekly in the first 13 weeks …”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…not in relation to the built environment. The first scale is the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS) 28 and the second is the Questionnaire for Eudaimonic Wellbeing (QEWB) 29 . Both scales are made up of a set of Likert style items, where respondents rate their agreement on a five point scale.…”
Section: The Building Wellbeing Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…not in relation to the built environment. The first scale is the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS) 28 and the second is the Research and Technology 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 Research and Technology 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 The items were rearranged into a random order and assigned a five point Likert scale, as seen in both the WEMWBS and QEWB, using the labels "Strongly disagree" to "Strongly agree". This is because time-related labels like "None of the time" to "All of the time" are considered to have lower face validity (i.e.…”
Section: The Building Wellbeing Scalementioning
confidence: 99%