Wartime Toxicology: Evaluation of a Military Medical Toxicology Telemedicine Consults Service to Assist Physicians Serving Overseas and in Combat (2005–2012)

Abstract

Those medical providers deployed to remote countries and tasked with caring for military personnel must diagnose and treat diseases and nonbattle injuries that result from exposures rarely seen in developed countries. Military providers must also function with limited resources and a lack of access to physician specialists, to include medical toxicologists. There have been limited published approaches to addressing this clinical gap for medical toxicology. To address this void, the US Army Medical Department deployed an electronic mail telemedicine system to provide teleconsultations for remote health-care providers worldwide, including Iraq and Afghanistan. This study aimed to describe the types and the frequency of toxicology teleconsultation and consultant responses using electronic mail to assist physicians serving in resource-limited locations. This was a retrospective observational study in which an unblinded data extractor independently reviewed all medical toxicology email consultations. Using a previously developed data collection worksheet, the extractor recorded the type of question asked by the consultant (overdose case, envenomation, occupational exposure, etc.) and the duration of time from when the teleconsultation was placed until the consultant replied. The extractor also recorded if the patient was adult or pediatric and if the patient was US military, US contractor, or local national. The extractor also recorded how often the toxicologist provided the consulting physician with information, resources, or protocols to aid in the management of future cases. In addition, for clinical teleconsultations, the extractor documented the frequency that the consulted toxicologist (i) provided a differential diagnosis or specific diagnosis, (ii) provided specific management guidelines for a patient, and (iii) recommended to evacuate or not evacuate a patient. The results were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Of the 99 consultations evaluated, the most common consultation was for snake envenomation and antivenom recommendations (n=23, 23 %) followed by accidental chemical exposures (n=14, 14 %), drug testing (n=13, 13 %), and substance abuse (n=10, 10 %). In 41 % of consults, the toxicologist provided a differential diagnosis or specific diagnosis, and in 60 % of cases, the toxicologist provided specific management or evaluation guidelines. In 11 % of cases, the toxicologist recommended for or against evacuation of the patient. In 25 % of consults, the toxicologist provided the consulting physician with information, resources, or protocols to aid in the management of future cases. The most frequent consultations for the military telemedicine consultation service were for direct patient cases, specifically snake envenomation management and accidental chemical exposures. Our results may be used to educate physicians prior to military deployment or international humanitarian efforts and to create toxicology clinical There is no prior publication, conflict of interest, or copyright constraint. Th...

The Virtual Toxicology Service: Wearable Head-Mounted Devices for Medical Toxicology

“…An important part of toxicology is the physical exam, which requires visualization of the patient. Real time feedback can be crucial in the acutely poisoned patient and immediate access to a subtle physical exam can help guide management [25][26][27]. A head-mounted wearable device with live video capabilities may enhance such real-time assessment of toxidromes by an off-site consulting toxicologist.…”

The Feasibility and Acceptability of Google Glass for Teletoxicology Consults

“…Modern wireless infrastructure, miniaturization of hardware, and improved penetration of cellular phones, computers, and tablets have advanced the use of mobile technology into health-care settings. However, no advanced technologies have yet been deployed to assist in the remote diagnosis and management of the poisoned patient [2,3].…”

Wearable Devices and Biosensing: Future Frontiers

“…From rolodexes and telephones to head mounted computers, advanced biosensing, and ingestible sensors, toxicologists have always been pioneers leveraging advanced technologies to solve problems [1,2]. As smartphones, fitness monitors, and connected devices become ubiquitous, toxicologists are naturally equipped with advanced tools that augment our bedside exam of poisoned patients.A new generation of toxicologists continually pushes the boundaries of technology in an effort to facilitate improved patient care and access to our expertise [1][2][3][4][5]. Head-mounted wearable computers can provide a toxicologist with a firstperson view of a poisoned patient, while a wrist-mounted sensor can stream key biometric data (e.g., heart rate, respiratory rate, skin temperature, and electrodermal activity).…”

“…A new generation of toxicologists continually pushes the boundaries of technology in an effort to facilitate improved patient care and access to our expertise [1][2][3][4][5]. Head-mounted wearable computers can provide a toxicologist with a firstperson view of a poisoned patient, while a wrist-mounted sensor can stream key biometric data (e.g., heart rate, respiratory rate, skin temperature, and electrodermal activity).…”