Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium. 2001 Proceedings. International Symposium on Product Quality and Integrity (C
DOI: 10.1109/rams.2001.902455
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Warranty calculations for missiles with only current-status data, using Bayesian methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rate of outcome = Outcome × 100 (10) The failure data for each subsystem has been weighed (w) against its variance, and it is calculated using…”
Section: Meta-analysis Test Stepsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Rate of outcome = Outcome × 100 (10) The failure data for each subsystem has been weighed (w) against its variance, and it is calculated using…”
Section: Meta-analysis Test Stepsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this day, research articles highlighting analytical methods on small data sets are practically limited. D.H. Olwell et.al [10] completed limited data with advanced information using the Weibull probability distribution. The paper conducted a firing analysis of 2000 motors used in missiles in field conditions using the Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) method and the Bayesian method [10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several exceptions are worth mentioning. Olwell and Sorell (2001) show how to supplement limited field failure data with prior information to estimate a Weibull lifetime distribution. Hamada (2005) describes a Bayesian analysis of repeated-measures degradation data from a laser life test in which the slopes of the degradation paths vary from laser to laser.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the data from such devices consist of both left‐censored (failure) and right‐censored (success) observations at prefixed inspection time points, and the observations are binary data (failure or not) instead of real failure time data. Other examples of one‐shot devices are automobile airbags, missiles (Olwell and Sorell), and fire extinguishers (Newby). This kind of data is also known as current status data in the survival analysis literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%