Proceedings of 1997 Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics
DOI: 10.1109/aspaa.1997.625615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Warped filters and their audio applications

Abstract: An inherent property of many DSP algorithms is that they tend to exhibit uniform frequency resolution from zero to Nyquist frequency. This is a direct consequence of using unit delays as building blocks; a frequency independent delay implies uniform frequency resolution. In audio applications, however, this is often an undesirable feature since the response properties are typically specified and measured on a logarithmic scale, following the behavior of the human auditory system. In this paper we present an ov… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The idea was that the arctangent function provided a mapping from the interval the domain of to the interval [0, 1), the range of The additive component allowed to be zero at smaller sampling rates, where the Bark scale is linear with frequency. As an additional benefit, the arctangent expression was easily inverted to give sampling rate in terms of the allpass coefficient (24) To obtain the optimal arctangent form the expression for in (23) was optimized with respect to its free parameters to match the optimal Chebyshev allpass coefficient as a function of sampling rate: (25) For a Bark warping, the optimized arctangent formula was found to be (26) where is expressed in units of kHz. This formula is plotted along with the various optimal curves in Fig.…”
Section: E Arctangent Approximations Formentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The idea was that the arctangent function provided a mapping from the interval the domain of to the interval [0, 1), the range of The additive component allowed to be zero at smaller sampling rates, where the Bark scale is linear with frequency. As an additional benefit, the arctangent expression was easily inverted to give sampling rate in terms of the allpass coefficient (24) To obtain the optimal arctangent form the expression for in (23) was optimized with respect to its free parameters to match the optimal Chebyshev allpass coefficient as a function of sampling rate: (25) For a Bark warping, the optimized arctangent formula was found to be (26) where is expressed in units of kHz. This formula is plotted along with the various optimal curves in Fig.…”
Section: E Arctangent Approximations Formentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very recently, the first-order allpass transformation was used to implement audio-warped filters directly in the warped domain [24], [25]. In this application, a digital filter is designed over the warped frequency axis, and in its implementation, each delay element is replaced by a first-order allpass filter, which implements the unwarping "on the fly."…”
Section: B Prior Use Of First-order Conformal Maps As Frequency Warpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the following section, only the phase differences between individual components are investigated as the magnitude responses can be accurately equalized using digital filters to obtain magnitude matched components at lower frequencies (e.g. by using frequency warped filters [32], [33]), but the phase mismatches are harder to correct.…”
Section: ) Magnitude Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Response modeling is especially challenging at low frequencies where standing waves cause significant variations in the frequency response at the listening position. Typical approaches for realizable equalization filter design include IIR filters or warped FIR filters (.e.g, [1], [2]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%