Abstract:The current article addresses the issue of warning signs for suicide, attempting to differentiate the construct from risk factors. In accordance with the characteristic features discussed, a consensus set of warning signs identified by the American Association of Suicidology working group are presented, along with a discussion of relevant clinical and research applications.
“…Warning signs are symptoms or stressors that are observed in the final day(s) before an event (Rudd, 2003;Rudd et al, 2006). Widely utilized in public education campaigns to prevent heart attacks, strokes, youth violence, and other health-related problems (Anonymous, 2004;Anonymous, 2008;Peterson and Newman, 2000), the concept of warning signs is starting to gain momentum in suicide prevention.…”
Objectives-This study examined warning signs for suicide observed in the final day(s) of life in Veteran decedents who received healthcare from Veterans Health Administration (VHA) (N=381), using data obtained from detailed chart reviews.Methods-Veterans who died within a week (7 days) of healthcare contact (18%) were compared to those who died later (82%). Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine differences in suicidal thoughts, psychiatric symptoms, and somatic symptoms as documented at the last visit, after controlling for demographic variables. A second multivariate regression examined whether the identified warning signs were also risk factors for suicide within a month (30 days) of contact.Results-Documented suicidal ideation, OR (95% CI) = 3.46 (1.15-10.38), and psychotic symptoms, OR (95% CI) = 2.67 (1.11-6.42), at the last visit increased the likelihood of suicide within a week of healthcare contact. Both variables also increased the odds of suicide within a month of contact.Conclusions-The assessment of suicidal ideation is critical to identifying Veterans at immediate risk. However, recognition of psychotic symptoms may also improve identification. In addition to indicating immediate risk, some warning signs may also suggest on-going risk.
“…Warning signs are symptoms or stressors that are observed in the final day(s) before an event (Rudd, 2003;Rudd et al, 2006). Widely utilized in public education campaigns to prevent heart attacks, strokes, youth violence, and other health-related problems (Anonymous, 2004;Anonymous, 2008;Peterson and Newman, 2000), the concept of warning signs is starting to gain momentum in suicide prevention.…”
Objectives-This study examined warning signs for suicide observed in the final day(s) of life in Veteran decedents who received healthcare from Veterans Health Administration (VHA) (N=381), using data obtained from detailed chart reviews.Methods-Veterans who died within a week (7 days) of healthcare contact (18%) were compared to those who died later (82%). Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine differences in suicidal thoughts, psychiatric symptoms, and somatic symptoms as documented at the last visit, after controlling for demographic variables. A second multivariate regression examined whether the identified warning signs were also risk factors for suicide within a month (30 days) of contact.Results-Documented suicidal ideation, OR (95% CI) = 3.46 (1.15-10.38), and psychotic symptoms, OR (95% CI) = 2.67 (1.11-6.42), at the last visit increased the likelihood of suicide within a week of healthcare contact. Both variables also increased the odds of suicide within a month of contact.Conclusions-The assessment of suicidal ideation is critical to identifying Veterans at immediate risk. However, recognition of psychotic symptoms may also improve identification. In addition to indicating immediate risk, some warning signs may also suggest on-going risk.
“…Following recommendations regarding acute warning signs and lethality [5,23], the structured risk assessment included a question about serious consideration of suicide and suicide planning. Additional questions assessed whether SI had been shared with a local care provider and whether the respondent had disclosed any information to the interviewer that was unknown to his/her local providers.…”
Section: Phase 1: Planning and Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Socio-demographic risks for suicide include age, gender, and ethnicity, with white men and older adults accounting for disproportionately high rates of completed suicides [4]. Distal suicide risk factors such as mental and medical illnesses represent relatively stable backdrops against which SI or suicidal behavior occurs [5]. For example, existing research indicates that suicide risk is elevated among persons with mental illness generally [6] and particularly among those with mood disorders [7], substance abuse/dependence problems [8], anxiety and posttraumatic stress disorder [9][10][11], self-reported physical illness [7,12], and chronic pain [13].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More proximal or transient factors in this domain include social isolation [14,15], interpersonal relationship disruption [7], acute and severe life stressors [16], and unemployment [17]. Finally, in particularly high-risk situations, proximal and acute warning signs suggest the possibility of imminent suicidal behavior [5]. These warning signs include a patient's expressed intent to die, preparatory behavior and planning such as gaining access to lethal means, and implementation of self-harm action plans [5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, in particularly high-risk situations, proximal and acute warning signs suggest the possibility of imminent suicidal behavior [5]. These warning signs include a patient's expressed intent to die, preparatory behavior and planning such as gaining access to lethal means, and implementation of self-harm action plans [5].…”
Research-based queries about patients' experiences often uncover suicidal thoughts. Human subjects review requires suicide risk management (SRM) protocols to protect patients, yet minimal information exists to guide researchers' protocol development and implementation efforts. The purpose of this study was to examine the development and implementation of an SRM protocol employed during telephone-based screening and data collection interviews of depressed primary care patients. We describe an SRM protocol development process and employ qualitative analysis of de-identified documentation to characterize protocol-driven interactions between research clinicians and patients. Protocol development required advance planning, training, and team building. Three percent of screened patients evidenced suicidal ideation; 12% of these met protocol standards for study clinician assessment/intervention. Risk reduction activities required teamwork and extensive collaboration. Research-based SRM protocols can facilitate patient safety by (1) identifying and verifying local clinical site approaches and resources and (2) integrating these features into prevention protocols and training for research teams. Suicidal ideation (SI) and behavior are significant for healthcare management across clinical and research settings. Within research studies, ethical practice mandates suicide risk management (SRM) protocols to guide researchers' efforts to maximize patient safety [1,2]. Key stakeholders in the adequacy of these protocols include patients who participate in research, the researchers who study patients at risk for suicide, and the Institutional Review Boards (IRB) that oversee research activities. Several important management tasks are relevant for research-based SRM. Detection tasks include identifying those research participants who evidence high risk and require SRM protocol entry [2]. Essential management tasks include the development and implementation of specific plans and identification and training of specific personnel to perform risk management activities [1,2].Guidance regarding the detection of suicidal threat can be found in the suicide literature, which characterizes risk across numerous domains [3]. Socio-demographic risks for suicide include age, gender, and ethnicity, with white men and older adults accounting for disproportionately high rates of completed suicides [4]. Distal suicide risk factors such as mental and medical illnesses represent relatively stable backdrops against which SI or suicidal behavior occurs [5]. For example, existing research indicates that suicide risk is elevated among persons with mental illness generally [6] and particularly among those with mood disorders [7], substance abuse/dependence problems [8], anxiety and posttraumatic stress disorder [9-11], self-reported physical illness [7,12], and chronic pain [13]. Psychosocial issues can be conceptualized as more proximal suicide risk factors, which exist on their own or in concert with distal risks. More proximal or transient fac...
Context
Individuals with early onset of bipolar disorder are at high risk for suicide. Yet, no study to date has examined factors associated with prospective risk for suicide attempts among youth with bipolar disorder.
Objective
To examine past, intake, and follow-up predictors of prospectively observed suicide attempts among youth with bipolar disorder.
Design
We interviewed subjects, on average, every 9 months over a mean of 5 years using the Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Evaluation.
Setting
Outpatient and inpatient units at 3 university centers.
Participants
A total of 413 youths (mean [SD] age, 12.6 [3.3] years) who received a diagnosis of bipolar I disorder (n=244), bipolar II disorder (n=28), or bipolar disorder not otherwise specified (n=141).
Main Outcome Measures
Suicide attempt over prospective follow-up and past, intake, and follow-up predictors of suicide attempts.
Results
Of the 413 youths with bipolar disorder, 76 (18%) made at least 1 suicide attempt within 5 years of study intake; of these, 31 (8% of the entire sample and 41% of attempters) made multiple attempts. Girls had higher rates of attempts than did boys, but rates were similar for bipolar subtypes. The most potent past and intake predictors of prospectively examined suicide attempts included severity of depressive episode at study intake and family history of depression. Follow-up data were aggregated over 8-week intervals; greater number of weeks spent with threshold depression, substance use disorder, and mixed mood symptoms and greater number of weeks spent receiving outpatient psychosocial services in the preceding 8-week period predicted greater likelihood of a suicide attempt.
Conclusions
Early-onset bipolar disorder is associated with high rates of suicide attempts. Factors such as intake depressive severity and family history of depression should be considered in the assessment of suicide risk among youth with bipolar disorder. Persistent depression, mixed presentations, and active substance use disorder signal imminent risk for suicidal behavior in this population.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.