Warning signal: Political trust, typhoons and the myth of the ‘Li's field’ in Hong Kong

Abstract

This article examines the discourse of 'Li's Field' in Hong Kong, named after tycoon Li Ka-shing and used to satirically denounce the government-business political nexus. The discourse challenges the apparent reluctance of the weather agency to decide that a typhoon is strong enough to warrant a city-wide suspension of business activities, which would obviously be detrimental to capitalist interests. In comparison to the earlier period characterised by political trust, institutional and political factors in recent decades have intensified the impression of government-business collusion and the erosion of political trust. Li's Field is a case illustrating how political distrust can spill over into bureaucracy, challenging the traditions of bureaucratic neutrality and meritocratic and scientific policymaking. This article provides an analysis of the 'field' with primary interview data, media discourse analysis and secondary data. This study contributes by exploring political trust in politicians and bureaucrats, and how the former spills over into the latter.

Disaster and Political Trust: A Natural Experiment from the 2017 Mexico City Earthquake

“…For example, in post-natural disaster environments, citizens express reduced trust in first responders such as local, state, and federal emergency medical assistance (EMA) (Reinhardt, 2015), and police and ambulance service (Reinhardt, 2019). In examining the government of Hong Kong's response to a typhoon, Wong and Kwong (2021) argue that distrust cultivated public mistrust in bureaucratic agents. This dynamic may have implications for general assessments of the state's trustworthiness if such negative evaluations seep into more general attitudes, including general political trust.…”