2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2013.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Warm climate isotopic simulations: what do we learn about interglacial signals in Greenland ice cores?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
90
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
9
90
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is highly likely that the Antarctic ice sheet was smaller than present by ∼ 127 ka, most probably because of the disappearance of the WAIS, and that the Greenland ice sheet was reduced in extent compared to present. Given that only about 3-4 m sea-level rise is covered by contributions from ocean thermal expansion (McKay et al, 2011), land-based glaciers (Marzeion et al, 2012), and melting of the Green-land ice sheet (NEEM Community Members, 2013;MassonDelmotte et al, 2013), the remaining sea-level rise is most likely to be linked to a mass loss from the Antarctic ice sheet. We propose a sensitivity experiment (lig127k-ais) to test the impact of a smaller-than-present Antarctic ice sheet, using a reduced ice-sheet configuration obtained from offline simulations with their own models or the model results such as those from DeConto and Pollard (2016) or Sutter et al (2016).…”
Section: Sensitivity To Prescribed Ice Sheetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it is highly likely that the Antarctic ice sheet was smaller than present by ∼ 127 ka, most probably because of the disappearance of the WAIS, and that the Greenland ice sheet was reduced in extent compared to present. Given that only about 3-4 m sea-level rise is covered by contributions from ocean thermal expansion (McKay et al, 2011), land-based glaciers (Marzeion et al, 2012), and melting of the Green-land ice sheet (NEEM Community Members, 2013;MassonDelmotte et al, 2013), the remaining sea-level rise is most likely to be linked to a mass loss from the Antarctic ice sheet. We propose a sensitivity experiment (lig127k-ais) to test the impact of a smaller-than-present Antarctic ice sheet, using a reduced ice-sheet configuration obtained from offline simulations with their own models or the model results such as those from DeConto and Pollard (2016) or Sutter et al (2016).…”
Section: Sensitivity To Prescribed Ice Sheetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There will also be a major focus on the tropical water cycle. These analyses will exploit available data sets for the LIG which mostly document surface sea and air temperatures across the globe (Anderson et al, 2006;Brewer et al, 2008;Capron et al, 2014;Hoffman et al, 2017;McKay et al, 2011;Turney and Jones, 2010), although recent efforts also synthesize reconstructions of sea-ice changes (Esper and Gersonde, 2014;Sime et al, 2013), of the deep ocean circulation (Oliver et al, 2010), and to a lesser extent the tropical hydrological cycle . In addition, several existing maps are reporting vegetation changes at the NH high latitudes (Bennike et al, 2001) and changes in lake area in the Sahara (Petit-Maire, 1999).…”
Section: Paleoenvironmental Data and Climate Reconstructions For Compmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When we apply the temperature-δ 18 O relationship determined for the current interglacial, this translates into an Eemian temperature increase of 8 ± 4 • C (NEEM community members, 2013). Correspondingly, the NEEM δ 18 O record suggests an even stronger Eemian warming than measured in δ 15 N. Sime et al (2013) showed within isotopic simulations that a reduction in the winter sea ice cover around the northern half of Greenland, together with an increase in SSTs in the same region, is sufficient to cause a > 3 ‰ interglacial enrichment of δ 18 O in central Greenland snow. The changes in SST and sea ice further lead to higher δ 18 O-temperature gradients, so a > 3 ‰ enrichment in δ 18 O might rather correspond to a 5 • C warming, which would be more in line with δ 15 N. The underlying mechanism is that a reduction in sea ice increases the fraction of water vapor deposited in central Greenland originating from more local (isotopically enriched) sources at the expense of more distant (isotopically depleted) sources (Sime et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Correspondingly, the NEEM δ 18 O record suggests an even stronger Eemian warming than measured in δ 15 N. Sime et al (2013) showed within isotopic simulations that a reduction in the winter sea ice cover around the northern half of Greenland, together with an increase in SSTs in the same region, is sufficient to cause a > 3 ‰ interglacial enrichment of δ 18 O in central Greenland snow. The changes in SST and sea ice further lead to higher δ 18 O-temperature gradients, so a > 3 ‰ enrichment in δ 18 O might rather correspond to a 5 • C warming, which would be more in line with δ 15 N. The underlying mechanism is that a reduction in sea ice increases the fraction of water vapor deposited in central Greenland originating from more local (isotopically enriched) sources at the expense of more distant (isotopically depleted) sources (Sime et al, 2013). However, a meaningful interpretation of the NEEM δ 18 O record is further complicated by the fact that the Eemian warming in Greenland mainly occurs in summer (due to orbital forcing) but δ 18 O is rather tied to winter temperatures (Sjolte et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…It is also characterized by enhanced interhemispheric and seasonal contrasts (Nikolova et al, 2013). Large uncertainties also reside in the conversion of Greenland and Antarctic ice core water stable isotope records to temperature, with implications for assessing the vulnerability of ice sheets to local warming (Masson-Delmotte et al, 2011a;Sime et al, 2009Sime et al, , 2013NEEM community members, 2013). Climate models have been shown to underestimate the magnitude of Arctic warming and to fail capturing Antarctic temperature trends Bakker et al, 2014).…”
Section: Selection Of Target Periodsmentioning
confidence: 99%