2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnt.2008.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Waring's number mod m

Abstract: Let p be an odd prime and γ (k, p n ) be the smallest positive integer s such that every integer is a sum of s kth powers (mod p n ). We establish γ (k, p n ) [k/2] + 2 and γ (k, p n ) √ k provided that k is not divisible by (p − 1)/2. Next, let t = (p − 1)/(p − 1, k), and q be any positive integer. We show that if φ(t) q then γ (k, p n ) c(q)k 1/q for some constant c(q). These results generalize results known for the case of prime moduli. Video abstract: For a video summary of this paper, please visit http://… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, Bourgain and Garaev proved in [3] that if δ > 1/4, then one can take δ ′ = 0.000015927 + o (1). Taking H = {x m , x ∈ F * p } and following the same argument of Konyagin and Shparlinski [19], the above bound immediately implies that if m < p 1−δ , then…”
Section: 4)mentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For instance, Bourgain and Garaev proved in [3] that if δ > 1/4, then one can take δ ′ = 0.000015927 + o (1). Taking H = {x m , x ∈ F * p } and following the same argument of Konyagin and Shparlinski [19], the above bound immediately implies that if m < p 1−δ , then…”
Section: 4)mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This work is supported by the National Science Foundation of China (11001170). 1 Note that N * m (b) = q k=0 N * m (k, b) and it is sufficient to consider the case |S| ≤ (q − 1)/2 by symmetry. Hence (1.2) and (1.3) follow from (1.4) directly.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To be precise, we ask for determining real or complex numbers such that the existence of their embeddings in R implies the equality w n (R) = w n (K), without computing w n (R) or w n (K). In case of n = 2, which motivates the above problem, [14,Theorem 4.5] proved by Kneser and Colliot-Thélène states that 1 2 ∈ R implies w 2 (R) = w 2 (K). For n = 3 one has to expect that some nonrational numbers have to be involved as the following example of complete discrete valuation ring of equicharacteristic zero shows.…”
Section: Questionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…where G(n) is the function related to the Waring problem. See also [1,37,41,42] for Waring problem in finite rings, [6,36] for number fields, [7,8,46] for p-adic rings and [31,33,39,44,45] for more general rings. There is an interesting algorithmic approach to the problem of sum of squares [17,18,27,28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%