2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.numecd.2015.03.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Warfarin use and the risks of stroke and bleeding in hemodialysis patients with atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and a meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple observational studies in CKD and dialysis have identified an association between warfarin use and increased risk for embolic stroke and bleeding (41)(42)(43)(44), whereas other studies suggest that warfarin is protective against stroke in this population (45).…”
Section: Rocket-af (Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Directmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple observational studies in CKD and dialysis have identified an association between warfarin use and increased risk for embolic stroke and bleeding (41)(42)(43)(44), whereas other studies suggest that warfarin is protective against stroke in this population (45).…”
Section: Rocket-af (Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Directmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, this study explicitly identified the population that was limited to patients with AF, who are undergoing dialysis, while Li et al 36 and Liu et al 38 included studies in patients who underwent dialysis and kidney transplant, who had wide variation in their kidney function. Second, Li et al ,36 did not quantify the association between warfarin and mortality outcomes. All of the reviews did not discuss specific stroke risks (ischaemic/haemorrhagic stroke) due to limited data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 23-35 Three meta-analyses of observational studies have shown that warfarin therapy had no effect for stroke prevention and mortality, but associated with a higher risk of bleeding in these patients. [36][37][38] The major limitations of the studies included: quantification of the effect of bias from different types of adjustments across studies, limited interpretation by population heterogeneity, outcomes specification and lack of recent published literature.…”
Section: Key Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to platelet dysfunction, reduced dietary vitamin K intake, altered bioavailability, higher susceptibility to vascular calcifications, HD patients may have a less favorable riskbenefit profile compared to non-ESRD patients with AF [26][27][28][29] . Epidemiological studies seem to corroborate such hypothesis: a recent meta-analysis showed that VKA does not reduce the risk of stroke and increase the risk of bleeding among ESRD patients with AF [24] . The risk-benefit ratio emerging from studies on VKA-related survival are more ambiguous.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite oral anticoagulants being the mainstay of treatment for patients with AF without renal impairment, the use of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in ESRD is more controversial, given their unclear effect on stroke and mortality risks [6,[12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] , coupled with increased incidence of major bleeding [24] . Concerns with the use of VKAs include initial overdosing due to vitamin K deficiency in ESRD, heparin use during dialysis, impaired platelet and coagulation function, and the possibility that warfarin may increase calcification formation in ESRD patients [25][26][27][28][29] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%