1994
DOI: 10.1177/0022002794038004002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

War, Socialization, and Interpersonal Violence

Abstract: This cross-cultural study investigates why some societies have more interpersonal violence (homicide, assault) than others. Multiple regression analysis suggests that socialization for aggression in boys in late childhood is by far the strongest socialization predictor of higher rates of homicide and assault. But why socialize boys for aggression? Other analyses suggest that socialization for aggression is a likely consequence, not a cause, of war. The theory of violence suggested here is that war is the major… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
101
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
5
101
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the occurrence of mammalian paternal care is relatively rare, it is particularly difficult to assess the importance of paternal behaviour among mammals, with most work having been conducted in humans. The potential impact the presence of caring fathers has on developing offspring is of significant importance as, among humans, for example, it may determine a child's appropriate emotional and cognitive development [47], health [48], and likelihood to engage in violent activity and crime [49]. On the other hand, a positive paternal influence on developing children increases cognitive competence (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the occurrence of mammalian paternal care is relatively rare, it is particularly difficult to assess the importance of paternal behaviour among mammals, with most work having been conducted in humans. The potential impact the presence of caring fathers has on developing offspring is of significant importance as, among humans, for example, it may determine a child's appropriate emotional and cognitive development [47], health [48], and likelihood to engage in violent activity and crime [49]. On the other hand, a positive paternal influence on developing children increases cognitive competence (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some assert that warfare (and resultant homicide) is distinct from "normal" aggression (McCall and Shields 2008). Ember and Ember (1994), however, demonstrated a close relationship between warfare and other forms of aggression, and they suggest that the presence of warfare may have the effect of lowering norms against other forms of violence (as parents may socialize their children for warriorhood, thereby legitimizing aggressive behavior). Kelly (2000) warns, though, that clear causality between socialization practices and aggression has yet to be established.…”
Section: Aggression Among Foragersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Fisher (1990), escalation is more likely when there are cultural differences between the sides or whenever they have experienced a history of antagonism. Such a history, can actually socialize people toward conflict escalation (Ember & Ember, 1994). Escalation is also more likely when the parties are unaware of its potential, when they are not concerned about its consequences, or when their actions are not limited in some manner (&helling, 1960).…”
Section: Escalationmentioning
confidence: 99%