2021
DOI: 10.3389/fsoc.2020.583680
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

War Metaphors in Political Communication on Covid-19

Abstract: Although militaristic metaphors have been pervasive during health crisis in political and science communication, few works have examined how these linguistic devices may influence crisis communication. Drawing on critical discourse analysis (CDA) and on crisis communication literature, I show how political representatives have used the war metaphor for very different purposes in terms of crisis communication and management of the current Covid-19 pandemic. I suggest that these findings challenge previous criti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“… 62 However, the metaphorical military language, which characterized institutional (e.g. government) 63 and media (e.g. newspaper and social) communication 64 , 65 during the pandemic, has been underlined to have positive and negative implications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 62 However, the metaphorical military language, which characterized institutional (e.g. government) 63 and media (e.g. newspaper and social) communication 64 , 65 during the pandemic, has been underlined to have positive and negative implications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several scholars have examined the use of metaphors, particularly the use of the war metaphor, in the media to speak about novel health emergencies such as Ebola, SARS (Wallis and Nerlich 2005), HIV AIDS (Nie et al, 2016), Cancer (Potts and Elena 2019;Harrington 2012;Reisfield and Wilson 2004;Sontag, 1978). Political authorities usually draw on metaphors and ordinary day images to speak about and make known emerging novel public health concerns (Neshkovska and Trajkova 2020;Castro Seixas, 2020). They do this through making associations between novel pandemics and what the public collectively, culturally, affectively, and politically understands and agrees upon as common knowldege.…”
Section: Anchoring and Objectificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such purposes are outside the scope of our primary focus: nuanced communication of scientific concepts to inform day-to-day choices by the public and to support rapid decision-making capabilities that are needed from policymakers in dynamic situations. As such, we do not consider 171 war-based analogies any further here and instead focus on analogies of SARS-CoV-2 in 172 terms of how they relate to key epidemiological concepts (but see 19,[21][22][23] on the use of 173 war rhetoric in the context of COVID-19).…”
Section: Analogies and Their Relationship To Models During Covid-19mentioning
confidence: 99%