2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.asd.2015.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Waptia revisited: Intimations of behaviors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
56
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
(52 reference statements)
3
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the presence of a first pair of antenniform appendages is well documented in several euarthropods, such as hymenocarines [10,11,13,14], clypecaridids [9,34], and waptiids [8,16,27], the traditional view is that most of these forms possessed largely homonomous post-antennular appendages with minimal functional specialization [5,12,13,15,20]. Alongside recent redescriptions of Burgess Shale taxa [14,16,35], E. multinodosa directly challenges this assumption, and demonstrates a level of appendicular complexity that approximates that of crown-group pancrustaceans by integrating morphologically-and implicitly functionally-differentiated tritocerebral antennae with mandibles and maxillules (Figures 1D and 2A-2D). The identification of trunk epipodites in E. multinodosa adds substantial support to this interpretation ( Figure 2E-2G; see also Figures S2H, S4G, and S4H), as these structures are widely regarded as diagnostic for pancrustaceans but have hitherto only been observed in microscopic Orsten taxa during the Cambrian [4,18,31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the presence of a first pair of antenniform appendages is well documented in several euarthropods, such as hymenocarines [10,11,13,14], clypecaridids [9,34], and waptiids [8,16,27], the traditional view is that most of these forms possessed largely homonomous post-antennular appendages with minimal functional specialization [5,12,13,15,20]. Alongside recent redescriptions of Burgess Shale taxa [14,16,35], E. multinodosa directly challenges this assumption, and demonstrates a level of appendicular complexity that approximates that of crown-group pancrustaceans by integrating morphologically-and implicitly functionally-differentiated tritocerebral antennae with mandibles and maxillules (Figures 1D and 2A-2D). The identification of trunk epipodites in E. multinodosa adds substantial support to this interpretation ( Figure 2E-2G; see also Figures S2H, S4G, and S4H), as these structures are widely regarded as diagnostic for pancrustaceans but have hitherto only been observed in microscopic Orsten taxa during the Cambrian [4,18,31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is evidence that some of these crustaceans were deposit feeders which may have burrowed efficiently262728, it is uncertain if they may have been able to produce branching burrows. Another group of shrimp-like arthropods known since the early Cambrian are waptiids293031. Based on morphologic evidence, it has been suggested that waptiids may have been able to burrow in various type of substrate31, although it remains unclear if they may have produced Thalassinoides -like systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another group of shrimp-like arthropods known since the early Cambrian are waptiids293031. Based on morphologic evidence, it has been suggested that waptiids may have been able to burrow in various type of substrate31, although it remains unclear if they may have produced Thalassinoides -like systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Waptiids are further distinguished from Clypecaris species by a trunk composed of fewer tergites, and the presence of an antenniform first appendage pair, as observed in Plenocaris 40 (Fig. 5E), Waptia 3536 (Fig. 5H), and potentially also in Pauloterminus 39 (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Raptorial limbs are rare among bivalved stem-group euarthropods, as the first pair of limbs is generally expressed as a pair of uniramous sensorial antennae with several podomeres8213536 (Fig. 5).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%