2012
DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2012-100918
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

wANNOVAR: annotating genetic variants for personal genomes via the web

Abstract: Background High-throughput DNA sequencing platforms have become widely available. As a result, personal genomes are increasingly being sequenced in research and clinical settings. However, the resulting massive amounts of variants data pose significant challenges to the average biologists and clinicians without bioinformatics skills. Methods and results We developed a web server called wANNOVAR to address the critical needs for functional annotation of genetic variants from personal genomes. The server provi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
322
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 377 publications
(332 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
322
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Variants were annotated using Annovar (42). Called variants were filtered to identify potential driving somatic mutations by removing synonymous or noncoding variants and those with frequencies >0.01 in normal populations from Exome Sequencing Project 6500 or 1000 Genomes, flow-corrected read depths <50, flow variant allele-containing reads <10, variant allele fractions (flow variant allele-containing reads/flowcorrected read depths) <0.10, or flow variant allele calling forward to reverse read ratio <0.2 or >5.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variants were annotated using Annovar (42). Called variants were filtered to identify potential driving somatic mutations by removing synonymous or noncoding variants and those with frequencies >0.01 in normal populations from Exome Sequencing Project 6500 or 1000 Genomes, flow-corrected read depths <50, flow variant allele-containing reads <10, variant allele fractions (flow variant allele-containing reads/flowcorrected read depths) <0.10, or flow variant allele calling forward to reverse read ratio <0.2 or >5.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Base calling and analysis were performed using Illumina HiSeq Analysis Software v2‐2.5.55.1311. Reads were mapped to hg19 using Isaac alignment (SAAC00776.15.01.27) and single nucleotide and small indel variants called Isaac variant caller Starling 2.1.4.2 and annotated as previously described4 based on ANNOVAR 5. Copy number variants were detected as described by Trost et al6 Individuals I‐1, I‐2, II‐4, II‐6, II‐8, and II‐9 were also genotyped using Infinium HumanOmni2.5‐8 BeadChip according to the manufacture's protocol.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raw sequence reads were aligned to human reference sequence hg19 using SAM/BAM. Sequencing data were analyzed using ANNOVAR software (openbioinformatics.org) (19). After filtering synonymous (i.e., not altering protein sequence) variants and those with estimated minor allele frequency greater than 15%, two independent investigators screened the resulting list for genes predicted to have nonsynonymous (i.e., altering protein sequencing) variants with known heart and lung expression and with association to human disease based on annotation in public databases (GeneCards, KEGG, PubMed, and OMIM).…”
Section: Wesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After filtering synonymous (i.e., not altering protein sequence) variants and those with estimated minor allele frequency greater than 15%, two independent investigators screened the resulting list for genes predicted to have nonsynonymous (i.e., altering protein sequencing) variants with known heart and lung expression and with association to human disease based on annotation in public databases (GeneCards, KEGG, PubMed, and OMIM). To further estimate the impact of selected variants on protein structure and function we used a set of metrics that take into consideration functional impact on evolutionary conserved domains: Polyphen2 (20), SIFT (21), MutationTaster (21), LRT (22), and GERP (19). All clinically relevant candidate variants were validated using Sanger capillary sequencing methods.…”
Section: Wesmentioning
confidence: 99%