2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.97.205120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wannier-function-based constrained DFT with nonorthogonality-correcting Pulay forces in application to the reorganization effects in graphene-adsorbed pentacene

Abstract: Pulay terms arise in the Hellman-Feynman forces in electronic structure calculations when one employs a basis set made of localized orbitals that move with their host atoms. If the total energy of the system depends on a subspace population defined in terms of the localized orbitals across multiple atoms, then unconventional Pulay terms will emerge due to the variation of the orbital nonorthogonality with ionic translation. Here, we derive the required exact expressions for such terms, which cannot be eliminat… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note, once again, that orbital-based Mulliken and Löwdin population analysis is far more economicalin terms of sheer speed by about 1 order of magnitudeto achieve as compared to the density-based Bader approach, but we will now show that Mulliken and Löwdin still yield chemically meaningful results when Bader’s charge analysis reaches its limits, for example, in the case of complex nanoporous compounds of amorphous nature. Because Mulliken population-based non-orthogonalized basis sets are not bound between 0 and 2 for a single orbital, a problem usually considered negligible, , a basis set transformation is needed. , This behavior can therefore be solved using Löwdin’s symmetric orthogonalization. , Hence, we will mainly discuss Löwdin charges in this work.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note, once again, that orbital-based Mulliken and Löwdin population analysis is far more economicalin terms of sheer speed by about 1 order of magnitudeto achieve as compared to the density-based Bader approach, but we will now show that Mulliken and Löwdin still yield chemically meaningful results when Bader’s charge analysis reaches its limits, for example, in the case of complex nanoporous compounds of amorphous nature. Because Mulliken population-based non-orthogonalized basis sets are not bound between 0 and 2 for a single orbital, a problem usually considered negligible, , a basis set transformation is needed. , This behavior can therefore be solved using Löwdin’s symmetric orthogonalization. , Hence, we will mainly discuss Löwdin charges in this work.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The linear-scaling first-principles code ONETEP 54 , within which we have implemented the XDFT formalism, variationally optimizes a minimal set of localized, non-orthonormal generalized Wannier Functions (NGWF), expanded in terms of psinc functions 55,56 , to minimize the total energy. ONETEP is equipped with an automated conjugate-gradients method for optimizing the cDFT (or XDFT) Lagrange multiplier 45,57,58 . We have used this, together with the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) XC functional 59 to calculate the lowest singlet excitation energies of the 28 closed-shell organic molecules contained in the wellknown Thiel set 60 .…”
Section: Methodological Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maximization of W with respect to Vc determines the Vc needed to enforce the targeted electronic occupation (Nc) in the cDFT-subspace. 103,119 Atomic forces can then be calculated, 100,123 allowing geometry optimization and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. The cDFT implementation in ONETEP rests on the use of non-orthogonal, atom-centered projectors (|φn⟩) to calculate the electronic occupation of the given cDFT-subspace, needed in Eq.…”
Section: Constrained Density Functional Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…cDFT in ONETEP has been applied to photovoltaic materials, 124,125 to interfaces in graphene-based composite materials, 123 and to the limitations of cDFT in constraining SIE-free solutions in standard DFT exchange-correlation functionals. 110 Going forward, we expect applications of cDFT to large-scale systems (e.g., biomolecules, nanoparticles, nanotubes, etc.)…”
Section: Constrained Density Functional Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%