“…However, simply suppressing those controversial rules has not sorted out the problem and the legal uncertainties surrounding judicial review of collaborative cross-border procurement remain largely the same as prior to the adoption of Directive 2014/24/EU. 135 The European Commission could have fixed this problem by proposing a reform of the Remedies Directive, which was subjected to a review of its regulatory fitness and performance (REFIT) in 2013. However, in 2017, and despite repeatedly acknowledging that there is much needed clarification on the interplay between the Remedies Directive and the 2014 Public Procurement Package, the Commission decided that no legislative action was needed.…”
Section: B Ensuring Effective Judicial Review and Procurement Remediesmentioning
Link to publication record in Explore Bristol Research PDF-document This is the author accepted manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Sweet and Maxwell via Westlaw at https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IFDBCC390156811EABC7885DCF72A2E27/View/FullText.html?navigationPa th=Search%2Fv1%2Fresults%2Fnavigation%2Fi0ad73aa6000001764d0725e728970916%3FNav%3DRESEAR CH_COMBINED_WLUK%26fragmentIdentifier%3DI192C00901A8811EA9769B670335A5208%26parentRank% 3D0%26startIndex%3D1%26contextData%3D%2528sc.Search%2529%26transitionType%3DSearchItem&listSo urce=Search&listPageSource=7c4fad4d2b3a504d4ed40807a0db5ba3&list=RESEARCH_COMBINED_WLUK&r ank=1&sessionScopeId=70ccfce8785606b5f788ad537c6d620c14d7901b2ea78473a8b505eebe5a440b&originat ionContext=Search%20Result&transitionType=SearchItem&contextData=(sc.Search)&comp=wluk&navId=19DC F87079E3B97A4159875DCC693C67. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.
“…However, simply suppressing those controversial rules has not sorted out the problem and the legal uncertainties surrounding judicial review of collaborative cross-border procurement remain largely the same as prior to the adoption of Directive 2014/24/EU. 135 The European Commission could have fixed this problem by proposing a reform of the Remedies Directive, which was subjected to a review of its regulatory fitness and performance (REFIT) in 2013. However, in 2017, and despite repeatedly acknowledging that there is much needed clarification on the interplay between the Remedies Directive and the 2014 Public Procurement Package, the Commission decided that no legislative action was needed.…”
Section: B Ensuring Effective Judicial Review and Procurement Remediesmentioning
Link to publication record in Explore Bristol Research PDF-document This is the author accepted manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Sweet and Maxwell via Westlaw at https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IFDBCC390156811EABC7885DCF72A2E27/View/FullText.html?navigationPa th=Search%2Fv1%2Fresults%2Fnavigation%2Fi0ad73aa6000001764d0725e728970916%3FNav%3DRESEAR CH_COMBINED_WLUK%26fragmentIdentifier%3DI192C00901A8811EA9769B670335A5208%26parentRank% 3D0%26startIndex%3D1%26contextData%3D%2528sc.Search%2529%26transitionType%3DSearchItem&listSo urce=Search&listPageSource=7c4fad4d2b3a504d4ed40807a0db5ba3&list=RESEARCH_COMBINED_WLUK&r ank=1&sessionScopeId=70ccfce8785606b5f788ad537c6d620c14d7901b2ea78473a8b505eebe5a440b&originat ionContext=Search%20Result&transitionType=SearchItem&contextData=(sc.Search)&comp=wluk&navId=19DC F87079E3B97A4159875DCC693C67. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.