2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10494-006-9054-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wall Versus Centerline Polymer Injection in Turbulent Channel Flows

Abstract: This experimental study compares the mean and turbulence characteristics of turbulent channel flows with polymer injection at the wall and at the centerline to assess the impact of the injection location on drag reduction. It also contrasts the drag reduction performance of a hydrolyzed polymer versus a non-ionic polymer under the same conditions. Wall injection of non-ionic and hydrolized polymers resulted in 23% and 9% larger drag reduction than corresponding centerline injection, respectively. In all cases,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of existing experimental studies on turbulence in polymer solutions were carried out in pipe flows (see, e.g., Virk et al 1967;Patterson, Zakin & Rodrigue 1969;Den Toonder et al 1997;Escudier, Presti & Smith 1999;Warholic, Massah & Hanratty 1999;Kim & Sirviente 2007), with only a few investigations in grid-generated turbulence (Gadd 1965;Barnard & Sellin 1969;Friehe & Schwarz 1970;McComb, Allan & Greated 1977;van Doorn, White & Sreenivasan 1999) or other 'washing-machine-like' configurations producing nearly homogeneous and isotropic turbulence (Liberzon et al 2006(Liberzon et al , 2009. The difference between the effect of polymers on turbulence without and with mean shear is that in the former case the polymers can only provoke additional local energy dissipation, while in the latter case they can in addition modify the mean shear and with it long-range energy exchange by instabilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of existing experimental studies on turbulence in polymer solutions were carried out in pipe flows (see, e.g., Virk et al 1967;Patterson, Zakin & Rodrigue 1969;Den Toonder et al 1997;Escudier, Presti & Smith 1999;Warholic, Massah & Hanratty 1999;Kim & Sirviente 2007), with only a few investigations in grid-generated turbulence (Gadd 1965;Barnard & Sellin 1969;Friehe & Schwarz 1970;McComb, Allan & Greated 1977;van Doorn, White & Sreenivasan 1999) or other 'washing-machine-like' configurations producing nearly homogeneous and isotropic turbulence (Liberzon et al 2006(Liberzon et al , 2009. The difference between the effect of polymers on turbulence without and with mean shear is that in the former case the polymers can only provoke additional local energy dissipation, while in the latter case they can in addition modify the mean shear and with it long-range energy exchange by instabilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies showed that this heterogeneous injection method with a diaphragm pump prevented mechanical degradation of the DRAs and led to optimal drag reduction performance . Also, the master solutions are injected at the wall (rather than centre) of the pipe as suggested by previous studies for better drag reduction efficiency . The concentration of all PEO concentrated solutions (with PEOs of three molecular weights) is 750 ppm, and the concentration in the pipeline is 5, 10, 15, and 20 ppm with four different flow rates.…”
Section: Experimental Setup and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%