2017
DOI: 10.3390/rs9080766
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wall-to-Wall Tree Type Mapping from Countrywide Airborne Remote Sensing Surveys

Abstract: Abstract:Although wall-to-wall, accurate, and up-to-date forest composition maps at the stand level are a fundamental input for many applications, ranging from global environmental issues to local forest management planning, countrywide mapping approaches on the tree type level remain rare. This paper presents and validates an innovative remote sensing based approach for a countrywide mapping of broadleaved and coniferous trees in Switzerland with a spatial resolution of 3 m. The classification approach incorp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, our achieved accuracies were comparable to other studies classifying deciduous and coniferous forests using even fully polarimetric C-band SAR data [16,83,84]. Compared with other technologies such as airborne laser scanning (OA of 89-96% and κ = 0.61 − 0.92) [85][86][87] or imaging spectrometer data (OA of 83-99% and κ = 0.73 − 0.98) [88][89][90], our forest type classification performance (OA of 86% and κ = 0.73) was not as competitive. This could be due to the lower spatial resolution used in this instance.…”
Section: Classification Of Forest Types and Speciessupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Nevertheless, our achieved accuracies were comparable to other studies classifying deciduous and coniferous forests using even fully polarimetric C-band SAR data [16,83,84]. Compared with other technologies such as airborne laser scanning (OA of 89-96% and κ = 0.61 − 0.92) [85][86][87] or imaging spectrometer data (OA of 83-99% and κ = 0.73 − 0.98) [88][89][90], our forest type classification performance (OA of 86% and κ = 0.73) was not as competitive. This could be due to the lower spatial resolution used in this instance.…”
Section: Classification Of Forest Types and Speciessupporting
confidence: 70%
“…At the Central European scale, we derived a forest mask based on the Tree Cover Density map 2015 from Copernicus (https://land.coper nicus.eu/), which has an original resolution of 20 m. Areas with less than 80% tree coverage were considered nonforested, and removed from the analyses. For forest mixture (fraction of broadleaved trees relative to needle-leaved trees), we used the tree-type map for Switzerland (Waser et al, 2017) (Ginzler & Hobi, 2015) that we aggregated to 10 × 10 m by average and standard deviation, respectively. Distance to forest edge was calculated from the 10 × 10 m aggregate of the Swiss forest mask.…”
Section: Vegetation Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forest mapping is an important source of information for assessing woodland resources and a key issue for any National Forest Inventory (NFI) programme (Waser et al 2017). Nowadays, global and nationwide wall-to-wall, raster-type maps of forest resources, based on satellite images, laser scanning, aerial orthomosaic and pho-togrammetric point cloud data are considered essential to monitor and quantify forest variables (Hansen et al 2013, Waser et al 2017, Kangas et al 2018. Forest maps are currently produced on the basis of remote sensing technologies at different spatial scales for global or continental forest resources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%