2018 Fluid Dynamics Conference 2018
DOI: 10.2514/6.2018-3405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wall modeled LES of compressible flows at non-equilibrium conditions

Abstract: METTU, BALACHANDRA REDDY. Wall Modeled LES of Compressible Flows in Non-Equilibrium Conditions. (Under the direction of Pramod Subbareddy.)A turbulent boundary layer is composed of a wide range of length scales and time scales. To resolve all these scales of motion, as with a DNS or traditional wall resolved LES, the grid sizes required scale roughly as the square/cube of the Reynolds number (Re). These requirements make high Re flows computationally very expensive. By modeling the effect of the motions close … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
(154 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent advances in numerical algorithms, computer hardware and the related computer science have led to successful predictions of complex multi-physics turbulent flows in aerospace applications by using wall-modelled large-eddy simulations (WMLES), but most of these breakthroughs have been limited to systems operating at subsonic and low-supersonic speeds . While notable attempts to employ WMLES have been recently made in supersonic and hypersonic flows (Kawai & Larsson 2012;Bermejo-Moreno et al 2014;Larsson et al 2015;Marco & Komives 2018;Mettu & Subbareddy 2018;Iyer & Malik 2019), this research area is still in its infancy, particularly in relation to aspects connected with hypersonic transitional phenomena (Yang et al 2017b) and thermochemical effects (Di Renzo & Urzay 2019). The present study contributes to this progress by utilizing a relatively simple, yet challenging configuration for benchmarking wall models in hypersonic flows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent advances in numerical algorithms, computer hardware and the related computer science have led to successful predictions of complex multi-physics turbulent flows in aerospace applications by using wall-modelled large-eddy simulations (WMLES), but most of these breakthroughs have been limited to systems operating at subsonic and low-supersonic speeds . While notable attempts to employ WMLES have been recently made in supersonic and hypersonic flows (Kawai & Larsson 2012;Bermejo-Moreno et al 2014;Larsson et al 2015;Marco & Komives 2018;Mettu & Subbareddy 2018;Iyer & Malik 2019), this research area is still in its infancy, particularly in relation to aspects connected with hypersonic transitional phenomena (Yang et al 2017b) and thermochemical effects (Di Renzo & Urzay 2019). The present study contributes to this progress by utilizing a relatively simple, yet challenging configuration for benchmarking wall models in hypersonic flows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This estimate of H is then fed into the ODE model for solving U [y] according to Eq. ( 11), (21), and (22). As the first iteration, the resulting inner profile U [y] can be used to update the estimate of H according to Eq.…”
Section: Performance Validation Of the New Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The equilibrium wall model has become increasingly popular for engineering applications since only ODEs are solved in the wall-normal direction instead of the more expensive PDEs as in the classical RANS models, e.g. see [17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. To further improve the predictive capability, several variants of non-equilibrium wall models have also been proposed by retaining part of the neglected terms, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hybrid methods based on an embedded grid, zonal methods, and seamless methods such as detached-eddy simulation may fall into this category (Cabot, 1995; Balaras et al, 1996; Davidson and Peng, 2003; Temmerman et al, 2005; Piomelli, 2008). This type of approach can handle non-equilibrium effects (Kawai and Larsson, 2013; Park and Moin, 2014) and may take into account the effects of compressibility and temperature variations, provided that relevant RANS models are used (Benarafa et al, 2007; Rani et al, 2009; Zhang et al, 2013; Mettu and Subbareddy, 2018; Iyer and Malik, 2019). However, the computational cost can be large as it requires a mesh that resolves the viscous and conductive sublayers for the RANS computation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%