2018
DOI: 10.1209/0295-5075/121/18005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wall effects on spatial correlations of non-affine strain in a 3D model glass

Abstract: Effects of hard planar walls with a particle scale roughness on the spatial correlations of nonaffine strain in amorphous solids are investigated via molecular dynamics simulations. When determined within layers parallel to the wall plane, normalized non-affine strain correlations are enhanced within layers closer to the wall. The amplitude of these correlations, on the other hand, is found to be suppressed by the wall. While the former is connected to the effects of a hard boundary on the continuum mechanics … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This adds a correction to Eq. ( 18) for the elastic propagator, which can be calculated via a method of images (Nicolas and Barrat, 2013a), and leads to a faster local relaxation for plastic events near walls [also see (Hassani et al, 2018)]. Combined with appropriate dynamical rules, the model semi-quantitatively reproduces the shear rate fluctuations δ γ(r) observed by Jop et al (2012) in the plug as well as the moderate deviations of the velocity profiles from the bulk predictions witnessed with smooth walls, provided that the EPM block size corresponds to around 2 droplet diameters (see Fig.…”
Section: Cooperative Effects Under Inhomogeneous Drivingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This adds a correction to Eq. ( 18) for the elastic propagator, which can be calculated via a method of images (Nicolas and Barrat, 2013a), and leads to a faster local relaxation for plastic events near walls [also see (Hassani et al, 2018)]. Combined with appropriate dynamical rules, the model semi-quantitatively reproduces the shear rate fluctuations δ γ(r) observed by Jop et al (2012) in the plug as well as the moderate deviations of the velocity profiles from the bulk predictions witnessed with smooth walls, provided that the EPM block size corresponds to around 2 droplet diameters (see Fig.…”
Section: Cooperative Effects Under Inhomogeneous Drivingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to reduce the statistical noise, the thus obtained displacement field is averaged over a length scale, w, usually of the order of the nearest neighbor distance. This coarse-graining process is performed via u CG (r, t) = i u(r i , t)φ(||r − r i ||)/ j φ(||r − r j ||), using the coarsegraining function, φ(r) = 1 (πw 2 ) 3/2 e −(r/w) 2 [10,31]. The sum is performed for all the particles within a sphere of radius ∼ w around point r. The strain tensor is obtained as ε(r, t) = (∇u CG (r, t) + (∇u CG (r, t)) )/2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under steady shear, glasses show evidence of long-range strain correlations, resulting from the elastic coupling of local shear transformation zones [5]. This leads to a strongly correlated strain pattern which resembles the Eshelby solution around a presheared spherical inclusion in a homogeneous isotropic elastic medium [6][7][8][9][10]. Relevance of these correlations for shear banding is also discussed in the literature [7,[11][12][13][14][15].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As seen from the corresponding panels of Fig. 3, the correlation of non-affine strain first follows an exponential decay and then switches over to the well-known power-law at longer distances [10,23].…”
Section: Exponential Decay At Intermediate Lengthsmentioning
confidence: 80%