The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2015
DOI: 10.1515/crelle-2015-0005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wall-crossing in genus zero Landau–Ginzburg theory

Abstract: We study a family of moduli spaces and corresponding quantum invariants introduced recently by Fan-Jarvis-Ruan. The family has a wall-and-chamber structure relative to a positive rational parameter ǫ. For a Fermat quasi-homogeneous polynomial W (not necessarily Calabi-Yau type), we study natural generating functions packaging the invariants. Our wall-crossing formula relates the generating functions by showing that they all lie on the Lagrangian cone associated to the Fan-Jarvis-Ruan-Witten theory of W . For a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rather, we recover a theory built from moduli spaces of weighted spin curves, which were introduced by the second author and Ruan in [25]. Nonetheless, the main result of [25] states that the theory built from weighted spin curves is equivalent, in genus zero, to the usual singularity theory, and it is through this equivalence that Theorem 1 generalizes the LG/CY correspondence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Rather, we recover a theory built from moduli spaces of weighted spin curves, which were introduced by the second author and Ruan in [25]. Nonetheless, the main result of [25] states that the theory built from weighted spin curves is equivalent, in genus zero, to the usual singularity theory, and it is through this equivalence that Theorem 1 generalizes the LG/CY correspondence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The ϕ-fields identically vanish in the genus-0 case for degree reasons. The proof is the same as that of Lemma 1.5 of [29]. Hence we have M 1/r,ϕ 0,γ = M 1/r 0,γ .…”
Section: Theorem 18 Impliesmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…We expect that the LG side and the CY side are more directly related near ǫ = 0. Using wall-crossing Ross-Ruan proved the LG/CY correspondence in genus 0 [29]. In genus 1, Guo-Ross used the wall-crossing formula to compute the FJRW invariants of the quintic 3-fold explicitly [18] and verified the genus-1 LG/CY correspondence [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Proof By , the I‐function Ifalse[double-struckC3/Z3false] lies on the Lagrangian cone Lfalse[double-struckC3/Z3false] encoding the genus 0 Gromov–Witten theory of [C3/Z3]. By standard properties of the Lagrangian cone, we obtain the following results, see, for example, : truerightSfalse[double-struckC3/Z3false](Θfalse(θfalse),z)(ϕ0)=leftIfalse[double-struckC3/Z3false],rightSfalse[double-struckC3/Z3false](Θfalse(θfalse),z)(ϕ1)=leftzsans-serifDSfalse[double-struckC3/Z3false](ϕ0)C1,rightSfalse[double-struckC3/Z3false](Θfalse(θfalse),z)(ϕ2)=leftzsans-serifDSfalse[double-struckC3/…”
Section: Genus 0 Theory For [C3/double-struckz3]mentioning
confidence: 98%