Abstract:This paper is the first to investigate the importance of natural environments in a workplace physical activity intervention. It provides evidence that a short walk in a natural environment twice a week can lower blood pressure and improve perceived mental health when compared to a built environment. Data suggests natural environments could be used to improve adherence to an intervention.
Affiliation: Daniel Brown,
“…Other studies have been specifically interested in natural environments. According to an intervention study by Brown et al (2014), spending one's lunchtime walking in a natural environment was beneficial in terms of improved mental health when compared to walking in built environments. Accordingly, this study suggests that break location may be significant in terms of recovery.…”
Section: Recovery During Lunch Break: Theoretical and Empirical Perspmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, our outside condition was quite general, and did not take specific recovery enhancing environmental factors (e.g., natural settings) into account. Given that natural settings are more likely to afford restorative experiences than are built environments, comparing them would be a good option for future studies (Brown et al, 2014).…”
Section: Model 1 Model 2 Exhaustion Vigormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, organizations may encourage regular lunch breaks and provide restorative environments (e.g., quiet rooms for relaxation). The question of how to recover successfully during lunch breaks has recently gained some research attention (Brown, Barton, Pretty, & Gladwell, 2014;Krajewski, Wieland, & Sauerland, 2010;Trougakos, Hideg, Cheng, & Beal, 2014). Nevertheless, research on internal recovery is still scarce (Sonnentag & Fritz, 2015).…”
This study had two aims. First, we examined whether lunch break settings, activities, and recovery experiences were associated with lunchtime recovery cross-sectionally. Second, we investigated whether lunchtime recovery was related to energy levels (i.e., exhaustion and vigor) across a 12-month period.We collected longitudinal questionnaire data among 841 Finnish workers (59% female, mean age 47 years) from 11 different organizations in various fields at two time points (spring 2013 and 2014). We used hierarchical regression analysis to test our hypotheses.We found that recovery experiences, that is, psychological detachment from work and control during the lunch break, were related to successful lunchtime recovery. After controlling for background factors, main job characteristics (workload and autonomy), and the outcomes at baseline, successful lunchtime recovery was related to a decrease in exhaustion and to an increase in vigor one year later.To conclude, lunch breaks offer an important setting for internal recovery during working days and seem to relate to energy levels at work over time.
“…Other studies have been specifically interested in natural environments. According to an intervention study by Brown et al (2014), spending one's lunchtime walking in a natural environment was beneficial in terms of improved mental health when compared to walking in built environments. Accordingly, this study suggests that break location may be significant in terms of recovery.…”
Section: Recovery During Lunch Break: Theoretical and Empirical Perspmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, our outside condition was quite general, and did not take specific recovery enhancing environmental factors (e.g., natural settings) into account. Given that natural settings are more likely to afford restorative experiences than are built environments, comparing them would be a good option for future studies (Brown et al, 2014).…”
Section: Model 1 Model 2 Exhaustion Vigormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, organizations may encourage regular lunch breaks and provide restorative environments (e.g., quiet rooms for relaxation). The question of how to recover successfully during lunch breaks has recently gained some research attention (Brown, Barton, Pretty, & Gladwell, 2014;Krajewski, Wieland, & Sauerland, 2010;Trougakos, Hideg, Cheng, & Beal, 2014). Nevertheless, research on internal recovery is still scarce (Sonnentag & Fritz, 2015).…”
This study had two aims. First, we examined whether lunch break settings, activities, and recovery experiences were associated with lunchtime recovery cross-sectionally. Second, we investigated whether lunchtime recovery was related to energy levels (i.e., exhaustion and vigor) across a 12-month period.We collected longitudinal questionnaire data among 841 Finnish workers (59% female, mean age 47 years) from 11 different organizations in various fields at two time points (spring 2013 and 2014). We used hierarchical regression analysis to test our hypotheses.We found that recovery experiences, that is, psychological detachment from work and control during the lunch break, were related to successful lunchtime recovery. After controlling for background factors, main job characteristics (workload and autonomy), and the outcomes at baseline, successful lunchtime recovery was related to a decrease in exhaustion and to an increase in vigor one year later.To conclude, lunch breaks offer an important setting for internal recovery during working days and seem to relate to energy levels at work over time.
“…The rate of CVD mortality is slightly decreasing in Czech population, but CVD occurrence is still significantly higher than in Western Europe [5]. Lack of physical activity is obvious even in the childhood -the percentage of overweight children has increased since the 90s, and so did the BMI of the parents [12]. Percentage of overweight and obese fathers is continuously increasing from 50s.…”
Section: Local Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Psychological and health influence of the relationship between the environment and the pedestrian movement has already been examined by previous studies [12], [13]. This paper focuses on narrower segment of the city -the transport infrastructure and its influence on pedestrian activity in the city.…”
Walking is the most natural human movement. A lack of walking on a daily basis causes a number of lifestyle diseases including diabetes, obesity and cardiovascular diseases. These medical complications are increasingly widespread by urban lifestyle. Comfort of non-physical activity allowed by developed transportation systems leads to the pandemic of physical passivity. Our case study is based on the data set of daily activity schedules of 89,948 urban citizens extracted from agent-based simulation model of multimodal mobility of Prague. The schedules contain the exact routes, transport modes and durations of all the trips made by the public transport users. The analysis proves that most of the walking trajectory is composed of the necessary daily routine: walk from home to the public transport station, walk from a different station to the workplace and back. This trajectory covers on average 85.4% of daily walking distance. With increasing age, the percentage is slightly higher. An average inhabitant of Prague, Czech Republic walks 3.1 km per day, which is considered a low daily physical activity. Residents are considered active, if they walk more than 6.6 km on an average day. We did not find a statistically relevant correlation with the marital status or education. However, a correlation with financial income is apparent: an average walking distance is higher in households with income higher than 1,130 EUR per household member. That could be caused by the fact that higher income Prague families tend to reside in the areas with lower building density and worse public transport connectivity. The daily travelling routine constitutes a majority of daily physical movement, which seems to be insufficient at the moment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.