9th IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Motion Control, 2006.
DOI: 10.1109/amc.2006.1631677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Walker with hand haptic interface for spatial recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Smart walker interfaces range from direct interfaces such as a joystick [6] and modified handlebars [7] to indirect interfaces such as a gate detection system [8]. Direct interfaces that do not require any physical contact are particularly relevant to our research.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smart walker interfaces range from direct interfaces such as a joystick [6] and modified handlebars [7] to indirect interfaces such as a gate detection system [8]. Direct interfaces that do not require any physical contact are particularly relevant to our research.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In literature, the most common algorithms apply mass/damped models [27,37], fuzzy logic control [10,35], or simple threshold/proportional algorithms [13,33,38].…”
Section: Manual Guidancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These interface can be broadly classified into direct and indirect types, according to whether the user's command or intention is directly passed to the walking devices. Direct interfaces include joysticks [19][20][21], switches and buttons [22,23] (or touch screens [24][25][26]), and voice communications [27,28]. To offer more sophisticate interactions, studies using force sensing and control are presented in [14,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%