The transporter associated with antigen processing (TAP) comprises two subunits, TAP1 and TAP2, each containing a hydrophobic membrane-spanning region (MSR) and a nucleotide binding domain (NBD). The TAP1͞TAP2 complex is required for peptide translocation across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. To understand the role of each structural unit of the TAP1͞TAP2 complex, we generated two chimeras containing TAP1 MSR and TAP2 NBD (T1MT2C) or TAP2 MSR and TAP1 NBD (T2MT1C). We show that TAP1͞T2MT1C, TAP2͞T1MT2C, and T1MT2C͞T2MT1C complexes bind peptide with an affinity comparable to wild-type complexes. By contrast, TAP1͞T1MT2C and TAP2͞T2MT1C complexes, although observed, are impaired for peptide binding. Thus, the MSRs of both TAP1 and TAP2 are required for binding peptide. However, neither NBD contains unique determinants required for peptide binding . The NBD-switched complexes, T1MT2C͞T2MT1C, TAP1͞T2MT1C, and TAP2͞T1MT2C, all T he transporter associated with antigen processing (TAP) plays a key role in major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I assembly and antigen presentation. The transporter functions in peptide transport from the cytosol into the endoplasmic reticulum, where a dynamic assembly of multiple proteins facilitate the assembly of peptides with newly synthesized MHC class I molecules (1, 2). Subsequently, MHC class I-peptide complexes exit the endoplasmic reticulum and are transported to the cell surface where the complexes are available for recognition by cytotoxic T lymphocytes. The structural organization of the TAP1͞TAP2 complex [two nucleotide binding domains (NBDs) and two membrane-spanning regions (MSRs)] is characteristic of the ATP binding cassette family of transmembrane transporters (3). Early studies showed that TAP complexes contained a binding site for peptides and that the peptide binding site comprised elements of both TAP1 and TAP2 (4, 5). Further cross-linking experiments with radiolabeled peptides suggested that regions of the MSRs of TAP1 and TAP2, just N terminal to the NBD, form the peptide binding site (6). Neither TAP1 alone nor TAP2 alone is capable of binding peptides (4). The role of the NBD and nucleotides in peptide binding is controversial. It was first reported that the presence or absence of nucleotides had no effect on peptide binding to TAP complexes (5). More recent reports described impaired peptide binding to mutant TAP complexes in which nucleotide binding was impaired (7). We examined the effects of nucleotides on peptide binding to wild-type TAP complexes or a mutant TAP1(K544M)͞TAP2 complex in which nucleotide binding to TAP1 was impaired (8). We showed that, at room temperature, peptide binding affinities and peptide dissociation kinetics were very similar for the TAP1(K544M)͞TAP2 mutant complex as for the wild-type complex, both in the presence and absence of nucleotides. These observations indicated a lack of correlation between nucleotide binding to TAP1 and peptide binding to TAP1͞TAP2 complexes (8). However, the role of nucleotide binding to the...