In this review, we highlight a number of the more important changes in the new revision as compared with the previous 2008 edition. 1,2 2 | PART -I
| Mature B-cell neoplasms
| Chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphomaThe presence of large proliferation centers (larger than a microscopic field viewed at 20× magnification), a high mitotic rate (>2.4/hpf) and high Ki-67 expression (>40%) are associated with more aggressive course in patients with CLL/SLL. 3 These neoplasms are more commonly associated with trisomy 12 or del(17p). 4 A more recent paper has linked proliferation centers to a higher frequency of TP53 mutation. 5 Nuclear expression of lymphoid-enhancer-binding factor 1 (LEF1) has been suggested as a highly specific marker for CLL/SLL as it is expressed aberrantly in almost all cases. 6In recent years, our knowledge about the genetic and molecular abnormalities in CLL/SLL has expanded substantially. A classification of CLL/SLL based on "DNA methylation profile" (naïve B cell-like vs memory B cell-like vs intermediate B cell-like) has been introduced showing prognostic value as naïve-like CLLs have mainly unmutated IGH variable (V) genes, whereas most epigenetically intermediate and memory-like CLLs have mutated IGHV. 7 The presence of a specific stereotype of IGH utilized by B-cell receptors may have prognostic significance as shown with the IGHV3-21 gene family. CLL/SLL cases using this family are associated with an adverse outcome regardlessof IGH mutation status. 8,9 There are new insights on the mutational landscape of CLL/SLL cases, especially mutations in SF3B1, TP53, NOTCH1, ATM, and BIRC3 which are associated with lack of response to more conventional therapies and overall poor outcome. 10