2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocs.2011.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

WaLBerla: HPC software design for computational engineering simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
71
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hereby, the flow variables are assumed constant along the y-axis, and the channel is rotated by an angle α about the y-axis. The test cases have been realized using the waLBerla (Feichtinger et al, 2011; framework.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hereby, the flow variables are assumed constant along the y-axis, and the channel is rotated by an angle α about the y-axis. The test cases have been realized using the waLBerla (Feichtinger et al, 2011; framework.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Widely Applicable Lattice-Boltzmann from Erlangen (waLBerla) (Feichtinger et al, 2011) is a massively parallel framework for simulating multiphase flows based on the lattice-Boltzmann method. The flow simulator can be coupled to a rigid body dynamics solver (PE, physics engine) (Iglberger and Rüde, 2011) using an explicit fluid-structure interaction technique, with the goal of, for example, simulating particulate flows or suspensions as they appear in many technical, environmental, or biophysical applications.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are a few major differences to other approaches: [55] and [56] both implement the lattice-Boltzmann method on top of a highly optimised octree grid implementation. I.e., the solver itself had to be developed more or less from scratch in a way that is adapted to the grid structure and its specific memory-optimal traversal in the Peano framework [57] or waLBerla [58]. Also, [56] provides a solver on statically adaptive meshes, which allows for much more sophisticated solutions in terms of run-time optimisation per core and on massively parallel hardware.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even in worst-case tests where we assumed full dynamical adaptivity in every fine grid time step, we observe good performance and scalability. The flexibility and minimal invasiveness of the p4est mesh comes with an acceptable overhead when compared to specialised versions such as [58,57].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%