2021
DOI: 10.3390/technologies9030050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Waking Up In the Morning (WUIM): A Smart Learning Environment for Students with Learning Difficulties

Abstract: Effectiveness, efficiency, scalability, autonomy, engagement, flexibility, adaptiveness, personalization, conversationality, reflectiveness, innovation, and self-organization are some of the fundamental features of smart environments. Smart environments are considered a good learning practice for formal and informal education; however, it is important to point out the pedagogical approaches on which they are based. Smart learning environments (SLEs) underline the flexibility of eclectic pedagogy that places st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
0
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, such digital tools can lead to students developing multilingualism, critical and creative thinking, collaboration, communication, and problem-solving skills, which comprise 21st century skills. Therefore, AI technology enhances students' learning [67][68][69] by utilizing either state-of-the-art platforms and programming languages [70] or by implementing smart technologies for learning and teaching [71][72].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, such digital tools can lead to students developing multilingualism, critical and creative thinking, collaboration, communication, and problem-solving skills, which comprise 21st century skills. Therefore, AI technology enhances students' learning [67][68][69] by utilizing either state-of-the-art platforms and programming languages [70] or by implementing smart technologies for learning and teaching [71][72].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Os quatro autores participaram da análise e tabulação dos resultados, e todos os trabalhos selecionados foram analisados por pelo menos dois pesquisadores. [Bottoni et al 2013] HAB12 [Habib et al 2012] SAN22 [Santos and Fernandes 2022] BRI16 [Brischetto and Tosi 2016] IGL14 [Iglesias et al 2014] SAP18 [Saplacan et al 2018] CAN17 [Canal et al 2017] KAI21 [Kaimara et al 2021] SAR15 [Sarkar et al 2015] CED18 [Cedillo et al 2018] KEN18 [Kent et al 2018] SCM12 [Santarosa et al 2012] COR15 [Corrêa et al 2015] LEE15 [Lee et al 2015 PAR16 [Park et al 2016] SIL15 [Silva et al 2015] DAH21 [Dahm and Reese 2021] PAT22 [Patrascoiu et al 2022] TSI17 [Tsiopela and Jimoyiannis 2017] GHE12 [Ghelardi et al 2012] POO11 [Poobrasert and Wongteeratana 2011] VIE15 [Viera-Santana et al 2015] GKA11 [Gkatzidou et al 2011] RAV14 [Ravanelli and Serina 2014] YIL22 [Yildiz et al 2022] GRA11 [Granic and Adams 2011] ROD11 [Rodriguez-Ascaso et al 2011] ZYD20 [Zydney et al 2020]…”
Section: Aplicação Dos Critérios E Seleção Dos Artigosunclassified
“…Outro desafio relaciona-se com a dificuldade de avaliação e validação das propostas de forma mais ampla: trabalho com amostras pequenas, períodos curtos de verificação ou restrita a um tipo de deficiência [Park et al 2016, Tsiopela and Jimoyiannis 2017, Kaimara et al 2021, Habib et al 2012, Granic and Adams 2011, Corrêa et al 2015].…”
Section: Problemas E Desafiosunclassified