2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.10.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Waiting time analysis of the multiple priority dual queue with a preemptive priority service discipline

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this reason, the majority of research papers analyzing time-dependent priority queues have tended to focus on the long-run steady-state performance of the system (Gail, Hantler, & Taylor, 1988;Kao and Wilson, 1999). Although a novel matrix-analytic method to analyze the expected waiting time of two customer classes in multiple priority dual queues has recently been proposed by Zeephongsekul and Bedford (2006), their analysis is again restricted to scenarios where there is a single server and a consistent arrival rate.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, the majority of research papers analyzing time-dependent priority queues have tended to focus on the long-run steady-state performance of the system (Gail, Hantler, & Taylor, 1988;Kao and Wilson, 1999). Although a novel matrix-analytic method to analyze the expected waiting time of two customer classes in multiple priority dual queues has recently been proposed by Zeephongsekul and Bedford (2006), their analysis is again restricted to scenarios where there is a single server and a consistent arrival rate.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Services marketing scholars tend to examine how firms operationalize the marketing concept, focusing primarily on customer satisfaction (for example, Bettencourt et al, 2005;Malthouse et al, 2004;Mittal et al, 2005;Reinartz et al, 2004). Operations researchers, in contrast, often function from a manufacturing paradigm, leaning toward answering questions through normative, analytical models (Roth and Menor, 2003); solving particular problems such as crosstraining (Agnihothri and Mishra, 2004;Chakravarthy and Agnihothri, 2005); providing techniques, such as data envelopment analysis (Gelade and Gilbert, 2003); or focusing on areas such as queuing (Mushko et al, 2006;Zeephongsekul and Bedford, 2006).…”
Section: Services Marketing and Operationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once the service of the lower-priority customer is finished, the server starts servicing the higher-priority customer. In a preemptive priority queue (see e.g., [6,11,13,15]), on the contrary, the service of a lower-priority customer will be interrupted at once if a higherpriority customer arrives and will not be resumed until the system is again void of higher-priority customers. It is easily seen that the preemptive category is favorable to higherpriority customers, because their delays are not at all influenced by lower-priority customers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%