1996
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.1996.tb00007.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Waiting for wasps: consequences for the pollination dynamics of Ficus pertusa L.

Abstract: Abstract. Pollination of fig trees depends on mutualist wasps that reproduce within their flowers. Until recently, it was assumed that there was a short window of time during which a fig crop could be pollinated. Hence, pollination of figs was thought to depend on extreme efficiency of the wasps in locating receptive trees. In that context, extensive data on the Costa Rican fig tree Ficus pertusa L. have been very difficult to understand. In F. pertusa, figs of different crops attract wasps at different stage… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
21
1
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
21
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The diameter of Ficus semicordata syconia gradually increases with syconium age throughout the period of receptivity, which means that larger receptive figs are also older and of lower quality to foundresses. This contrasts with the situation in Ficus hispida and Ficus pertusa, where attractiveness first increases with diameter and then decreases, and larger syconia attracted more pollinators than smaller syconia (Patel et al 1995;Anstett et al 1996). Taken together, the differences recorded between different Ficus species suggest that reproductive traits associated with floral longevity in the genus are adaptive and have been subject to natural selection.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 78%
“…The diameter of Ficus semicordata syconia gradually increases with syconium age throughout the period of receptivity, which means that larger receptive figs are also older and of lower quality to foundresses. This contrasts with the situation in Ficus hispida and Ficus pertusa, where attractiveness first increases with diameter and then decreases, and larger syconia attracted more pollinators than smaller syconia (Patel et al 1995;Anstett et al 1996). Taken together, the differences recorded between different Ficus species suggest that reproductive traits associated with floral longevity in the genus are adaptive and have been subject to natural selection.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 78%
“…Similar results have been described in other Ficus species [21,26]. Ostioles are usually described as opening at the beginning of the receptive phase and closing rapidly at the end, once pollinators have entered [17,30,45,46]. Our results suggest that ostiole closure in un-pollinated figs is an incremental and slower change associated with a decline in attractant volatiles released by the figs and increasing difficulties for pollinators that try to enter.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…defined CPS 50 as the number of fig trees necessary to maintain a wasp population for 5 years with a probability of 0.5, and estimated that it was 89 for F. natalensis. Individuals in several fig species are known to prolong the receptive phase and wait for wasps when there are no available wasps (Khadari et al 1995;Anstett et al 1996). When this fact was built into the model and fig trees waited for wasps up to 3 weeks, CPS 50 decreased to 50 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%